|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 20, 2019 8:49:22 GMT -5
I don't know about referee vs wrestler; but, they have done crooked referee angles, well before the WWF did it with the other Danny Davis (not the member of the Nightmares and Corny's partner in OVW).
Most referees were trained in the business and many were former wrestlers. Sometimes they were guys starting out. Ricky Morton's father, Paul, had been a wrestler and was a long time referee, in Tennessee. Bronko Lubich, one of the main refs in World Class, used to be Angelo Poffo's tag-team partner, in Chicago. Nick Patrick, of WCW, was the sone of The Assassin, Jody Hamilton, and wrestled a bit in his father's promotion and Alabama.
I don't know any specifics; but, I'm sure they did a crooked ref angle or two that resulted in a stipulation match with the ref having to wrestle, much like they would do with managers.
Nothing could top the angle ECW did, where crooked ref Bill Alfonso, had to wrestle Beulah, and got the snot kicked out of him, legit. It was punishment (for real) for being a stooge for Tod Gordon, who was passing stuff on to WCW and raiding talent.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 20, 2019 23:54:50 GMT -5
Just finished watching the first 2 episodes of NWA Powerrr (rrrrrrrrrrrr................). Good shows! Old school feel, not exactly Saturday Evening, at 6:05, on WTBS; but, still quite good. The match between Tim Storm and Nick Aldiss had some actual psychology, wasn't a spot fest, had a backstory, had some emotional content. Opening match was too much on spots, they had an actual squash match, or two. Some good promos; they got some guys who can cut an entertaining promo; they just need to have something to say. Nothing too outrageous in the aerial front, nothing overly complicated that took 10 minutes to execute. Cornette was good on color, interviewer Dave Marquez had some good facials that add some nice touches. Announcer Joe Galli is fine; a bit green; but Cornette helps keep it going. Dave Marquez is from Championship Wrestling From Hollywood, which was the NWA tv platform, before Corrigan bought the trademarks. The set is a throwback, though their interview area has a "Powerrr" graphic that looks like a DIY sign kit, on a convenience store. I expected to see a beer sign to one side and a decal that says they sell lottery tickets. Crowd was enthusiastic and they didn't drag things out. The commercials are a bit goofy, with one for Austin Idol's Universal Wrestling College (Daddy!) and another for Tony Falk's Waffles and Tire Irons, in Paducah, KY. Idol's old enough now he probably doesn't need to bleach his hair. Falk is an old favorite from the Poffo ICW, Memphis and Dallas. Never more than a mid-card guy; but, solid worker. The school is legit (well, it exists; but, I don't know how good it is or isn't), the Tony Falk thing is comedy, probably done with Corny's input. They need to improve the ring intros. They kind of lacked energy, didn't announce weights or home towns. The fell a bit flat. At least one of the squash guys was said to be trained by Robert Gibson and the RNR Express were there for the tapings (haven't appeared yet on the tv); so, they may be providing enhancement talent. Lot of the guys were involved in Championship Wrestling from Hollywood, which isn't surprising. I don't know if this is a model for long term success; but it was pretty entertaining. I did notice they beefed up the size of the Domed Globe Belt (aka the "Ten Pounds of Gold") Here is the size, in Flair's day... and the current version... The National title belt is a replica of the old US title belt, from Chicago (and copied by Detroit and Mid-Atlantic... The Women's Title belt is a replica of Mildred Burke's Tag titles are based on the old Mid-Atlantic World Tag belts (before they updated them...) Everything on it screams 1980s, from the Dokken music, to the sound effects and graphics. Only things missing are a Rubik's Cube and a can of New Coke.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2019 11:58:10 GMT -5
Pet hate: pre-WWE events being referred to as WWE on documentaries.
No, Hulk Hogan did not win the WWE Championship in 1984. It was the WWF Championship. There was no WWE in the 80s or 90s. Ultimate Warrior did not enter the WWE in 1987.
Whatever that panda charity says, and whatever pedantry they legally engaged in to protect their acronym, there was a WWF before WWE. Just like the chocolate bar I ate as a kid was a Marathon bar, not a Snickers bar (it's called Snickers now). I will refer to it as Snickers now, but as a kid, the bar I ate was called Marathon.
It's just a real pet hate, and I hate it in writing, too, e.g. reading about how Bret Hart won his first WWE Championship in 1992. There was no WWE in 1992, and I don't know if the panda charity had engaged in any kind of legal action back then. If I have it right, WWF formally became WWE in either April or May 2002.
I am not sure why the panda charity ever did what they did, nor do I care. No-one was ever going to mistake a conservation charity with a wrestling promotion. I used to donate to the charity years ago, but I cancelled donations after the whole WWE thing. Why? Believe it or not, it wasn't me throwing a tantrum, but expressing dissatisfaction at the charity using MY donations to engage in frivolous action. And I told the charity that in writing.
I wanted my donations to go to conservation and animal protection. I didn't want the WWF's income, from which donors' money is derived, being wasted in a frivolous court case against a wrestling federation. Whatever the legal arguments, I don't know why the panda charity had to do what they did.
And, for a while, the WWF logo was censored on DVD releases or from the mouths of WWF superstars. It's all rather pathetic, really.
So, no, I won't accept 80s championship matches being referred to as "WWE bouts" or hear about Hogan defending the "WWE Championship" against Andre the Giant.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 21, 2019 23:10:59 GMT -5
The World Wildlife Fund trademarked the initials WWF, before Vince McMahon tried to. They had a settlement that Vince did not uphold and the World Wildlife Fund took then to court, necessitating the change. Blame Vice for not being a man of his word.
I agree with you regarding retroactively applying the name to the past; but, Vince's past is mostly fiction anyway, so I don't put much thought into it. Orwell never dreamed of Vincent K. McMahon.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2019 10:38:02 GMT -5
One thing that I'm thinking in the past 2-3 days ... What if Sting and the Ultimate Warrior had their careers changed? ... Sting going in the same as the Warrior and the Ultimate Warrior replaces Sting as main wrestler in WCW. I'm pretty sure that Sting could had won the Intercontinental Championship at least 3 times and the World Heavyweight Championship another 3-4 times and his battles with Bret Hart, Triple H, and others would be legendary. I really don't know how the Ultimate Warrior would fared ... but he'll probably win the US Title at least twice and the WCW World Championship maybe once and the WCW World International Championship more than once ... possibly 3 times. The problem with the Warrior he would not fit in as good as the Sting. Sting would fit anywhere and his time in TNA Impact was totally wasted and I felt many fans were robbed for not going into WWE at that time and I understand everything about Sting and his problems dealing with WWE. Vintage Photograph of them.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 22, 2019 12:58:32 GMT -5
Sting would have likely done very well in the WWF; he could talk, he was exciting, and he could work a match. Warrior I don't think would have got over in the more work-oriented WCW. Vince had a thing for muscleheads and pushed them to the moon. WCW was built on the foundation of Southern-style wrestling, where exciting matches were the bread and butter. Flair did wonders with people; but, I'm not sure he could have pulled a good match out of Hellwig.
An interesting twist to the idea is at what stage would you switch their destinations? They both got their first real exposure in Memphis, as the tag team The Freedom Fighters. To put it mildly, they sucked. They had learned to bump and not much else. Sting was way bulkier as the original group, Power Team USA, was a foursome of power lifters. They were mildly better by the time they left; but not much. At that stage, either going anywhere as a solo is not likely to lead to anything beyond a midcard status. They just didn't have the skills and would have been lost in the shuffle of other steroid goofs.
They went to work for Bill Watts, in the UWF, as the Blade Runners, in an attempt to create his own Road Warriors. They stunk and Watts wasn't one to put up with a bad product. He laid down an ultimatum: learn to work or leave. Sting stayed, learning to work, with Eddie Gilbert as manager, partnered with young Rick Steiner (who was using his real name, Rob Rechsteiner, at one point, in the UWF). He got better and even started turning face, as he split with Hot Stuff & Hyatt International (Gilbert's stable, with Missy Hyatt also in the mix). Meanwhile, Hellwig went to World Class, which was desperate for a babyface, with Kerry Von Erich out from his motorcycle injury and Kevin having his own injury issues. They had introduced a fake cousin, Lance Von Erich, which wasn't working. Rick Rude had just left, taking most of the crowd interest with him. Hellwig came in as the Dingo Warrior (I guess because Crocodile Dundee was out, or something) and stunk up the joint; but, he looked impressive. While in UWF, both Sting & Warrior had gotten more cut, reducing the bulk and increasing definition. He looked like a Road Warrior clone and it was good enough for World Class, as he was something different. World Class went through big problems, as booker Ken Mantell left and took a bunch of guys to create a rival promotion, Wild West Wrestling, including Lance Von Erich. Fritz, himself exposed that he wasn't family. Hellwig continued for a bit, but got the call from the WWF.
Looking at the UWF stage, again, I think Sting could have flourished, provided we are talking after he had been learning from Gilbert and others. That is where he got his real training. Hellwig still didn't know how to work and his matches were pretty simple affairs, with other people trying to make him look good. Send him to WCW with that and maybe you have a Nikita Koloff level of a guy who can't work, but looks impressive.
For Hellwig, someone like Flair would really have to take him under their wing and emphasize his positives, while hiding the negatives. Flair was high on Sting and tapped him for the first Clash of Champions, which made Sting as a main event guy (plus he was having great matches with Muta). With Warrior, you have a whole different dynamic. You also don't have Dusty Rhodes as a booker, who helped shape Nikita. If you have Warrior working with guys like Flair and Steamboat, Rude, Kevin Sullivan or Barry Windham, you might get him closer to a Nikita level. Thing is, even without being able to work, Nikita had learned to execute one really wicked looking move well and they built around that. Hellwig really didn't have any kind of signature move, prior to that. He did muscle spots, punches and slams and that was about it. He would really need a lot of polishing for that environment. I see maybe a tv title, possibly US title; but, I don't see them putting the World title on him, without him vastly improving and he had already show an indifference to that.
Meanwhile, Sting goes into the WWF. He's got size, can move well in the ring, has a personality. However, he hasn't learned from Flair and Muta. So, someone else needs to fill those roles. Warrior worked a bit with Rude and Sting could do a bit of that, which would help; but, it would really take guys like Bret and Shawn Michaels to do the equivalent of learning from Flair. Sting had the motivation and I think he would have grown, if those circumstances happened. I do think he could have gotten more over than Warrior, with a similar push. For one thing, he could deliver a much better promo. Definitely see the IC title coming his way and could see the World title, with Hogan leaving and Vince still stuck on size (though Sting wasn't as defined as Warrior). It would depend on Vince really getting behind Sting and pushing him, like he did Warrior. Perhaps Sting would put more emphasis on his cosmetics, in this environment.
Their careers really paralleled one another; but, both were not draws as champion. Warrior sold a ton of merchandise, which is part of why Vince loved him. Sting could have conceivably filled that role; but, I doubt he would have drawn that much better. In that period, no one really was. The days of Hulkamania were over and too much of that audience was gone. Things had gotten expensive and the WWF was mired in scandal. WCW suffered under poor leadership and bad marketing. I could see Herd pushing Warrior, in the absence of Flair and I can see it being a huge flop. I think that would have killed him as a future draw, more than it did Sting. What helped Sting was Vader coming to work full time, and their series of matches helping to maintain some draw, with Flair gone. I don't see Hellwig having those same kind of matches. I kind of think Vader would have eaten him up.
A lot of the Warrior's mystique was in keeping his matches incredibly short, to disguise the fact he couldn't do much. He came in right as Hogan was leaving, was pushed as unstoppable, and Hogan did a clean job for him, making him look like a superhero. Kids were especially fans for those reasons. That sold merchandise; but, it didn't sell tickets, in part because Vince didn't have the guys to carry Warrior and help him grow (because he wouldn't put him against Shawn and Bret). They liked seeing him on tv, liked buying merch with his face; but didn't really care enough to come to arenas, in droves. Would Sting have filled that role better? I kind of think so; but wonder if Vince would have taken to him the same way.
Sting really got to the top through a lot of hard work, learning from Watts and Eddie Gilbert, Muta and Flair. He got good pushes but he had worked hard to get to those spots, which is why Flair wanted to elevate him. He saw his work ethic. He saw how fans reacted to him. In a period where WCW was abysmal, there was always Sting to comfort us. When WCW got Hot, all Sting had to do was stand outside the ring and point and fans went nuts.
Yeah, I see Sting still being a major star; but think Warrior was, at best, a 50/50 proposition, in WCW. Way more "ifs" than Sting.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2019 13:07:22 GMT -5
Good question!
The Warrior, and I was a fan, did appear to be a volatile person who did take himself a bit too seriously at times. His no doubt volatile and strong personality, while helping him succeed, also meant he a had a shorter career. That does not make him a failure. He won the WWF Championship, is in the Hall of Fame, and will be fondly remembered. But he never seemed able to get on with WWF for too long. His second tenure was shorter than his first, his third tenure was shorter than his second. And his WCW tenure was disastrous, but I don't put that all on him.
My point, and it's a good question you've asked, is that I cannot imagine it would have been different had be been in WCW. His volatile and strong personality would have probably led to a shorter career in WCW.
It's also important to remember that WCW as a different entity with what it presented. Yes, they weren't immune to cartoony gimmicks like Big Josh, Van Hammer, and the Colossal Kongs. But they did seem to care more about wrestling than sports entertainment. Would those running JCP/WCW, and the likes of Ric Flair, really have wanted to put Warrior over? There were fewer sports entertainers in top spots at JCP/WCW as it was presenting a very different flavour from the WWF.
Of course, I am saying that from a 1987-1991 perspective. If Warrior had wanted to join WCW in the mid-90s, I am sure Hulk Hogan would have vouched for him. Hogan certainly got a lot of folk in, most of whom were his buddies (Honky Tonk Man, Hacksaw Jim Duggan, etc.). There were rumours of the Bushwhackers being brought in by Hogan, but that never happened. If Warrior had joined WCW in the early-to-mid 90s, during Hogan's era, I still don't see it being a long run. Hogan was playing second fiddle to nobody! He would have probably wanted Warrior to turn heel, and from interviews I've read over time, I don't think Warrior wanted to turn heel. So I suppose we'd have seen the likes of Warrior and Hogan versus the Dungeon of Doom. Or Vader putting over Warrior. But I don't think Warrior and Hogan could have co-existed in WCW for too long due to their egos.
Obviously, Warrior did join WCW in 1998 - and Hogan got his WrestleMania VI win back.
You asked a great question, sir. Hypothetical questions are my favourite kind of topics. I just think Warrior would have only had a modicum of success had he wrestled in JCP/WCW.
As for Sting, I think he'd have been a success in the WWF, no doubt being in world title contention and/or winning a top title. Had he entered the WWF in, say, 1994, I think he'd have had bouts against the likes of Jeff Jarrett, Owen Hart, Diesel, etc. And they might well have had him battle Bret Hart at some point.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2019 13:09:34 GMT -5
codystarbuck ... I need to do a little research on Sting and Ultimate Warrior career paths and get back with this thread by end of the week or next Monday at the latest. Excellent Recap ^^^ here.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2019 6:28:18 GMT -5
I look forward to reading further views on this, and we will return to this topic, I know.
In the meantime, I was thinking about the WWF European Championship recently. Established in 1997, Davey Boy Smith was the first European Champion, beating Owen Hart in the finals of a tournament. The belt was discontinued in 2002 (wasn't it merged with the Intercontinental Title?).
As a short-term gimmick that gave Davey Boy Smith a belt, I liked it. And it made sense for a Brit to win it.
But what was the point of the title? What was its unique selling point? Did it have one? Here's the analogy I use: if the WWF Championship was akin to an Olympic gold medal, and the WWF Intercontinental Championship was akin to an Olympic silver medal, wasn't the WWF European Championship akin to an Olympic bronze medal?
Also, not many Europeans held the belt. Shawn Michaels, Triple H, Shane McMahon, Jeff Jarrett and others aren't Europeans. Surely the whole point of a European Championship was that it should have been held by European wrestlers - and used as a prop to build up European wrestlers, particularly on international tours?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2019 8:53:43 GMT -5
I look forward to reading further views on this, and we will return to this topic, I know. In the meantime, I was thinking about the WWF European Championship recently. Established in 1997, Davey Boy Smith was the first European Champion, beating Owen Hart in the finals of a tournament. The belt was discontinued in 2002 (wasn't it merged with the Intercontinental Title?). As a short-term gimmick that gave Davey Boy Smith a belt, I liked it. And it made sense for a Brit to win it. But what was the point of the title? What was its unique selling point? Did it have one? Here's the analogy I use: if the WWF Championship was akin to an Olympic gold medal, and the WWF Intercontinental Championship was akin to an Olympic silver medal, wasn't the WWF European Championship akin to an Olympic bronze medal? Also, not many Europeans held the belt. Shawn Michaels, Triple H, Shane McMahon, Jeff Jarrett and others aren't Europeans. Surely the whole point of a European Championship was that it should have been held by European wrestlers - and used as a prop to build up European wrestlers, particularly on international tours? Davey Boy Smith was the 1st and only one other European Wrestler did win this belt was William Regal that won it in the Attitude Era. Personally this belt is practically useless because it's did not do anything good for WWE at all. To most people the European Championship is basically a Junior Title to the Intercontinental Championship and that why they dropped the belt because it was declared useless. This belt had a bad ending and I believe that Rob Van Dam was the Final Champion. WWE did a very poor job promoting this belt and did not even bother bringing in European Wrestlers at all. WCW Television Championship Belt is more prestigious than this joke of a belt; and WCW did not even care about this belt at all. I was hurt when the belt got thrown in the garbage can by Kevin Nash. Basically, the European Title was basically the WWE version of the WCW TV Title. Hacksaw Jim Duggan was the Final WCW Television Champion.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2019 9:40:47 GMT -5
For me, the only worthwhile WCW Television Championship runs of the "modern era" are 1991-1993. I know it had a history going back to 1974. But for me, when the likes of Austin was defending it against Barry Windham, it had prestige. At the time, I remember feeling it had equivalence to the United States Championship. It felt special.
As time went on, there were good wrestlers carrying it, but it lost a lot of prestige, particularly during the Hulkamania Era. Abandoning the title in a trashcan was one of many absurd ideas by WCW. For me, its best times were 1991-1993. I remember being on the edge of my seat when Windham defended it against Austin on WCW Worldwide. Good wrestlers did hold it later on, but it became less and less important.
It's all in the booking, I guess. I feel 1992 was a year when EVERY WCW title mattered. The World Title, US Title, TV Title, Tag Team Titles, and United States Tag Team Titles all had prestige, involving the likes of Sting, Vader, the Dangerous Alliance, the Freebirds, etc. It all felt so important. But by the end of the decade, it seemed only the WCW World Title and US Title mattered (I know the WCW United States Tag Team Championship was discontinued in 1992).
This is what frustrates me. Yes, the world title should be the most important thing - in 1992, it was as Sting defended it against all comers, losing it to Vader at one point. Rude brought a lot of prestige to the US Championship. I remember how important the hype was for Terry Taylor & Greg Valentine losing the US Tag Team titles to the Freebirds. And, as mentioned, Austin was bringing a lot of prestige to the Television Championship.
It's a shame WCW couldn't keep the momentum of those titles going.
But it was never simple with WCW, eh? Quite honestly, I wasn't sure what the NWA World Heavyweight Championship brought to WCW when they resurrected it in 1992. We'd already got the WCW World Championship, why did we need the NWA World Heavyweight Championship too? Yes, there were good matches, such as Ric Flair VS Barry Windham at Beach Blast 1993, but I thought it was redundant - and then when that became the WCW International World Heavyweight Championship, I sighed. I sighed a lot. When that happened, it meant we'd got, in one promotion, the WCW World Heavyweight Championship, the United States Championship, and the WCW International World Heavyweight Championship. It was like wrestling had taken its cue from the many alphabet groups that boxing had and has.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 23, 2019 11:21:33 GMT -5
The European title was created for Davey Boy to win, then defend while they ran tours of the UK and Europe. With business down in the US, they tried foreign tours (as did WCW) which sold quite well (since it was special, to them). However, when business picked up in the US, they didn't tour Europe as much and did single shows, rather than a string of dates. So, the European title became just another belt to feud over. It was united with the Intercontinental title. Now, they have a UK title, for the UK branch (which, last I heard, was being run by British wrestling legend Johnny Saint). The WCW tv title had prestige when it was held by Arn Anderson, as he and Dusty feuded over it. In the early days of the 4 Horsemen, it was Flair with the World title, Tully with the US title, and Arn & Ole with the National tag titles or Arn with the World TV title. It kind of went up and down according to who held it and if they were being pushed by the bookers. Steven (William) Regal got long runs with it and it had some cache, as it did when it was Sting & Muta fighting over it. It was used well with Jericho, then just became a toy when Nash and Russo were booking. When Arn had it, it had the cool-looking red leather... Funny thing was, before Crockett ook over World Championship Wrestling, they had their own World's Television Title..... When Crockett took over, they called it the National Television title, then just dropped it.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2019 14:26:36 GMT -5
If I remember rightly, Regal started stipulating that his TV title was only being defended for the first ten minutes or so of a match. If I am remembering that rightly, it was a great gimmick.
He wrote a column in WCW Magazine about it. As was the norm back then, columns were written in character. He talked about how football (soccer) often saw teams winning a match, but losing in the final minutes of the game due to a fluke. And that he wasn't prepared to risk losing on a fluke, so was only offering the TV Championship for the first ten minutes or so.
As a kid, I used to draw my own titles that I'd made up. I created the WWF Intercontinental Tag Team Titles, a WWF Canadian Championship, and a WWF African Championship. Wish I still had those drawings.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2019 18:09:17 GMT -5
The WCW tv title had prestige when it was held by Arn Anderson, as he and Dusty feuded over it. In the early days of the 4 Horsemen, it was Flair with the World title, Tully with the US title, and Arn & Ole with the National tag titles or Arn with the World TV title. It kind of went up and down according to who held it and if they were being pushed by the bookers. Steven (William) Regal got long runs with it and it had some cache, as it did when it was Sting & Muta fighting over it. It was used well with Jericho, then just became a toy when Nash and Russo were booking. When Arn had it, it had the cool-looking red leather... Funny thing was, before Crockett ook over World Championship Wrestling, they had their own World's Television Title..... When Crockett took over, they called it the National Television title, then just dropped it. The one on the bottom is one of the ugliest belt that I ever seen; the other one is unique and distinctive and I do remembered it briefly and it's stands out in a crowd and you know that you see the WCW Television Champion walking your way. I just find that belt so cool and it's an eye opener in my mind.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 23, 2019 22:00:49 GMT -5
The National TV belt looked a lot better when it was new. That is a recent era photo. The belt was introduced around 1983/84, That wa one of the go-to designs for title belts, in that era, along with the Crockett Wold TV title belt. Domed Globe belt copies for other titles.... Then, the Eagle belts... This style was used all over.... See it in a lot of Southern territories, in the late 70s and early 80s, in Central States, Dallas, Mid-South, you name it. You wan't ugly? The WWA title belt, in Indianapolis... They used that thing right up to the end, in the late 80s.
|
|