|
Post by brutalis on Mar 29, 2017 13:23:20 GMT -5
Sad that the Jason Momoa Conan did so poorly because given time and writing that could have easily been closer to the Howard Conan that we all love. Blame Hollywood and the general public for the typecasting of Arnold being the ONLY Conan version to be accepted. Why is it that every other series can be remade and recast without fail but something with such potential as Howard's Conan gets pushed aside? Usually it's all about whoever owns the rights will fail to do anything and then if lucky someone else can pick it up and do something. Let us pray to Crom and Mitra (or to hell with the Gods as Conan might better believe) we one day see more and better Conan movies.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2017 13:27:20 GMT -5
Paradox aren't the rights holders in terms of having a movie license. They own outright all the properties in the Howard estate. Their control won't lapse until they sell it or declare bankruptcy and have their assets auctioned off. They sought the Howard properties because of the popularity of the Arnie movie, not out of any love for the Howard properties as a whole. As long as they control the Howard estate, the focus is not going to change, not because of outward forces, but because that is what they want.
-M
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 11, 2017 13:14:53 GMT -5
Apparently Dark Horse has shelved the Conan project after rejecting the script and asking for massive rewrites and indefinitely delayed the hardcover collections of the Grindberg Tarzan material. Grindberg is none too happy with DH right now based on some recent posts.
-M
|
|
|
Post by Roquefort Raider on Aug 11, 2017 14:27:40 GMT -5
Apparently Dark Horse has shelved the Conan project after rejecting the script and asking for massive rewrites and indefinitely delayed the hardcover collections of the Grindberg Tarzan material. Grindberg is none too happy with DH right now based on some recent posts. -M I can imagine. I would have given Dark Horse my money for those books, I swear! I wonder what the problem is with the script that it would necessitate a rewrite. Without trying to flog a dead horse, Brian Wood's run had such bad moments that I assumed Dark Horse accepted just about anything. (I mean, it got me to drop a Conan title... and that takes a lot of doing!)
|
|
|
Post by Warmonger on Aug 11, 2017 14:36:02 GMT -5
Well that's a good way to piss in my Cheerios
|
|
bran
Full Member
Posts: 227
|
Post by bran on Aug 20, 2017 14:14:09 GMT -5
no way it's a quality control! except for excellent Tim Truman's Conan (and Mignola's, these stand shoulder to shoulder with Roy's Conan) the other ranged from solid to mediocre.
perhaps that REH Estate or DH are stalling for some reason. just guessing here - maybe there are enough Conan titles right now and there is only certain amount that you can sell.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2017 14:34:52 GMT -5
I think Conan's time at Dark Horse may be winding down. The last issue of Conan the Slayer is due out this month (#12) and aside from the Conan vs. Wonder Woman mini, there's no Conan books scheduled for Dark Horse in any of the announced solicitations. With the cancellation of the Thomas/Giorello project before it got off the ground, no ongoing, and the poor sales on the last Truman/Giorello King Conan mini, and form what I gather poor presales on the second Conan omnibus, I am not sure it's worth DH's time o keep the license. here was a Kull mini announced form IDW, the first isse of which hit, but the rest has been delayed indefinitely, so I am just not sure there is enough of a market out there to keep the license viable for any of the big 5 publishers. Conan may have to lay fallow for a while until the market changes or someone can put together a series that has some growth potential, but I don't see it happening any time soon. Conan has a hardcore fan base, but it's small and it's not something that looks to have any appeal to a larger, younger demographic right now to create any growth potential.
-M
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Aug 23, 2017 14:49:21 GMT -5
I'm not aware of the sales, but Conan feels like a property that would be better handled with periodic long graphic novels coming out that would sell through outlets other than comic shops. I'd guess the demographic for buying Conan is longer in the tooth than that for mainstream Big Two funnybooks.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2017 15:35:36 GMT -5
I'm not aware of the sales, but Conan feels like a property that would be better handled with periodic long graphic novels coming out that would sell through outlets other than comic shops. I'd guess the demographic for buying Conan is longer in the tooth than that for mainstream Big Two funnybooks. My personal feeling is they should skip distributors, and just crowdfund (Kickstarter or something else) OGN adventures and/or adaptations and sell direct to customers without worrying about trying to convince retailers to shell out dollars and give up shelf space for a product that only has a 5-7K customer base with zero growth potential. But that might shortchange sales even more. I am not sure, but in a crowded market there's just no room for growth for this type of book despite the popularity of fantasy in other mediums. Dark Horse tried bringing in name talent (Wood, Bunn, Van Lente) that has cache with the younger wider comics demographic, but it didn't bring people to Conan and alienated the fan base. They's tried crossovers (Groo, Sonja, Wonder Woman) to get hype and attention on the book, it hasn't worked. I just don't see there being much of a viable market for it right now. I said elsewhere, and I'll repeat here, it very much feels like Marvel and Conan in the mid-late 90s where they were throwing everything Conan at the wall after SSoC and CTB were done to see if anything stuck in an attempt to hang on to the license, and none of it stuck in that market. It took a few years of the character laying fallow an putting Busiel and Nord on the book at another publisher to renew interest enough to make it viable again, and they still needed that 25 cent zero issue to get people to look at it. Nothing Conan is sticking tot he wall right now. It might be time t let it go fallow for a while and see if things change. God knows Paradox isn't capable of doing anything to renew interest in the properties. -M
|
|
|
Post by brutalis on Aug 23, 2017 16:06:01 GMT -5
Reconnect Conan with Roy Thomas and find a truly skilled/stylistic artist willing to work in black and white and revive the Savage Sword concept for the modern age. Don't do monthlies, instead doing "graphic novel style" approach with perhaps a quarterly series. If not one full long story then perhaps 1-2 or 3 connected stories with continuing story lines in each "novel" might be better for our barbarian.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2017 16:10:01 GMT -5
Reconnect Conan with Roy Thomas and find a truly skilled/stylistic artist willing to work in black and white and revive the Savage Sword concept for the modern age. Don't do monthlies, instead doing "graphic novel style" approach with perhaps a quarterly series. If not one full long story then perhaps 1-2 or 3 connected stories with continuing story lines in each "novel" might be better for our barbarian. Dark Horse put Roy on for 12 issues, the Road of king series and it sold poorer than either series before and after it, so I don't think that's going to work. The tried doing a bi-monthly/quarterly prestige format anthology featuring Conan called Savage Sword of Robert E. Howard and it sold like crap, so that's not going to work either. They need to look forward, not try to find answers in the past because it's a completely different market today than it was 20 years ago and nothing that only appeals to the hardcore base is going to do well in the Diamond market. -M
|
|
|
Post by berkley on Aug 24, 2017 0:21:44 GMT -5
I can't put my finger on anything in particular I think they're doing wrong but for some reason most of the Dark Horse Conan stuff hasn't connected with me even though I still feel like a pretty big fan of the character and the whole sword-and-sorcery sub-genre REH created.
Part of the problem is the artwork - not that any of it is an absolute turn-off, but none of it has leaped out and made me want to read a story. And what I've seen of other REH characters from Dark Horse has looked a notch or two below their Conan comics, including my personal favourite Kull. Actually, I can't recall now if I've seen anything featuring other REH heroes like Bran Mak Morn or Solomon Kane.
Maybe it's just that I haven't looked at anything closely enough. I do think Thomas Giorello's artwork looks good, so I should try one of his series sometime. I think I asked RR and other DH Conan readers for some recommendations a while back, I'll see if I can dig up that post and get some ideas.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2017 9:19:34 GMT -5
I can't put my finger on anything in particular I think they're doing wrong but for some reason most of the Dark Horse Conan stuff hasn't connected with me even though I still feel like a pretty big fan of the character and the whole sword-and-sorcery sub-genre REH created. Part of the problem is the artwork - not that any of it is an absolute turn-off, but none of it has leaped out and made me want to read a story. And what I've seen of other REH characters from Dark Horse has looked a notch or two below their Conan comics, including my personal favourite Kull. Actually, I can't recall now if I've seen anything featuring other REH heroes like Bran Mak Morn or Solomon Kane. Maybe it's just that I haven't looked at anything closely enough. I do think Thomas Giorello's artwork looks good, so I should try one of his series sometime. I think I asked RR and other DH Conan readers for some recommendations a while back, I'll see if I can dig up that post and get some ideas. Of all the artists who have worked on Conan comics, I feel Cary Nord has come closest to capturing what REH had on the page, the lithe pantherish powerful Conan, and also captured the Frazetta vibe in his work. Smith's Conan is beautiful but he doesn't always feel powerful or dangerous. Buscema's Conan is seen as the standard, but for me he is too bulky and not lithe and pantherish enough to fit the way Howard conceived him, and is the main influence on the Arnie casting as a muscle-bound Conan which transformed the perception and path of the character in pop culture, which in turn influenced all the artists working on Conan in the 90s where he became a steroid freak. Nord had a nice balance between the two extremes of Smith and Conan, and his Conan wore armor and used weapons much as Conan did in the Howard tales and didn't cavort around in a loincloth or fur diaper to keep some kind of Marvel hero union suit regulation intact. Nord's take wasn't perfect. There was some room for improvement in his page to page and panel to panel storytelling at times, but as for his depiction of Conan capturing what Howard put on the page, I think he was the pinnacle of the Conan artists. Now some of the artists who have depicted Conan in other artistic venues (especially those who illustrated the Del Rey editions of the Howard tales in particular Gary Gianni) are just as good if not better than Nord at capturing the Howardesque feel of Conan's look. Now I think Buscema, Smith and some of the other artists did a very good job with Conan and are immensely talented, but I don't think they captured Howard's Conan as well as Nord. My pet theory is that most of the Marvel artists (and Roy himself) were working form the de Camp/Carter influenced depictions of Conan in the pastiches and their edits of Howard's tales, which is where I started with Conan too, but the Conan of those stories to me feels like a diluted version of the character once you read the pure Howard versions free of de Camp and Carter's influence. Conan is more primal and the descriptions of him feel more visceral. Busiek and Nord (and the del Rey illustrators) were using the Howard texts and not the de Camp edits for their source material, and to me it made a difference in the depiction of Conan in their work. -M
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Aug 24, 2017 10:16:52 GMT -5
I can't put my finger on anything in particular I think they're doing wrong but for some reason most of the Dark Horse Conan stuff hasn't connected with me even though I still feel like a pretty big fan of the character and the whole sword-and-sorcery sub-genre REH created. Part of the problem is the artwork - not that any of it is an absolute turn-off, but none of it has leaped out and made me want to read a story. And what I've seen of other REH characters from Dark Horse has looked a notch or two below their Conan comics, including my personal favourite Kull. Actually, I can't recall now if I've seen anything featuring other REH heroes like Bran Mak Morn or Solomon Kane. Maybe it's just that I haven't looked at anything closely enough. I do think Thomas Giorello's artwork looks good, so I should try one of his series sometime. I think I asked RR and other DH Conan readers for some recommendations a while back, I'll see if I can dig up that post and get some ideas. My pet theory is that most of the Marvel artists (and Roy himself) were working form the de Camp/Carter influenced depictions of Conan in the pastiches and their edits of Howard's tales, which is where I started with Conan too, but the Conan of those stories to me feels like a diluted version of the character once you read the pure Howard versions free of de Camp and Carter's influence. Conan is more primal and the descriptions of him feel more visceral. Busiek and Nord (and the del Rey illustrators) were using the Howard texts and not the de Camp edits for their source material, and to me it made a difference in the depiction of Conan in their work. -M To be fair...anyone between the ages of 25 and 90 likely started out with Conan either through the pastiches or the Marvel comics. I'm trying to remember the first time I saw unexpurgated Howard, but I know it was after high school so it was probably into the 90s.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2017 11:15:41 GMT -5
My pet theory is that most of the Marvel artists (and Roy himself) were working form the de Camp/Carter influenced depictions of Conan in the pastiches and their edits of Howard's tales, which is where I started with Conan too, but the Conan of those stories to me feels like a diluted version of the character once you read the pure Howard versions free of de Camp and Carter's influence. Conan is more primal and the descriptions of him feel more visceral. Busiek and Nord (and the del Rey illustrators) were using the Howard texts and not the de Camp edits for their source material, and to me it made a difference in the depiction of Conan in their work. -M To be fair...anyone between the ages of 25 and 90 likely started out with Conan either through the pastiches or the Marvel comics. I'm trying to remember the first time I saw unexpurgated Howard, but I know it was after high school so it was probably into the 90s. I get that, I certainly do. The de Camp/Carter Conan was ubiquitous through the late 60s to the mid-80s, and it wasn't until after that point that the effort to make the pure Howard texts available began. It's not the fault of those who discovered the de Camp edits and pastiches that those were the only ones available, but seeing what happened to Conan art after the Howard originals became readily available for me highlights how much the de Camp interpretation cast a shadow on depictions of Conan in art and pop culture, and how different it could have been if the Howard texts had been available. -M
|
|