shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Feb 15, 2017 21:16:23 GMT -5
Quick question to all the reviewers. What do you get out of writing reviews? Why do you do it? Is it the enjoyment of the discussions the reviews spawn? Does being forced to slow down and really read the comics increase your appreciation for the material? Do you just love writing? Generally curious. For me, it's a combination of several of these: 1. I absolutely get more out of the stories when I read them with the intention of reviewing them. The reading experience becomes more work, but it also yields more reward if the content is high quality. 2. I love to create, but I'm not a good artist or craftsman, and I don't have any novels or poems within me that I feel a deep desire to write. So writing about the comics I'm reading provides a practical outlet. I feel like I've made something when I'm done. 3. Absolutely, I love the discussions that follow. Any reviewer who tells you they don't care if no one reads and comments is either a liar or a far better person than I am. Replies and "likes" are major forms of encouragement for me. I don't care if anyone "likes" my posts on facebook, but when I'm writing something I've given a lot of thought to and put a lot of work into, I absolutely thrive on knowing it's being enjoyed/appreciated.
|
|
|
Post by The Cheat on Feb 16, 2017 16:10:03 GMT -5
2. I love to create, but I'm not a good artist or craftsman, and I don't have any novels or poems within me that I feel a deep desire to write. So writing about the comics I'm reading provides a practical outlet. I feel like I've made something when I'm done. This is pretty much exactly why I asked the question, I've become aware recently of how much I'm consuming compared to creating and wondered if writing scratched that itch for a lot people. Thanks for the great explanation Replies and "likes" are major forms of encouragement for me. Here, have one of each
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,197
|
Post by Confessor on Feb 17, 2017 1:59:07 GMT -5
Quick question to all the reviewers. What do you get out of writing reviews? Why do you do it? Is it the enjoyment of the discussions the reviews spawn? Does being forced to slow down and really read the comics increase your appreciation for the material? Do you just love writing? Generally curious. My reasons for doing it are somewhat similar to shax's. I do enjoy the discussions that the reviews spawn, obviously, since it's that kind of in-depth comic discussion that I come here to get, ultimately. But I'm also quite a creative person too and I just enjoy writing. The third reason I do review threads is that, actually, I learn an awful lot about my favourite series in the process. Take my Star Wars review thread, for example: when I started that thread, I already knew al lot about the series and was very familiar with the individual issues in it. But there's no doubt that during the process of writing those reviews, I have come to know the series even more intimately. In particular, I learned a lot about what was going on behind the scenes on the comic, just from reading the books themselves, gleaning editorial information from the letters pages and sourcing interviews with the creative talents who worked on the book online. For that reason alone, the thread was totally worth doing, but, of course, the "likes" and comments are the really fun part of a review thread's reward.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2017 19:10:01 GMT -5
I would like to add another reason. Sometimes I just want to share something I enjoyed with others. That way they can decide if it is worthwhile for them to look for it. It is nice to get a PM from someone saying they tried something I reviewed & liked it. Especially if you review something not well known or a bit off beat.
|
|
|
Post by Nowhere Man on Jul 19, 2017 0:38:38 GMT -5
I've learned that with comics review threads, if I'm not invested in the creators, it's very hard to maintain interest. For a time I got overly fixated on reading chronologies, which, less face it, forces you to wade through a lot of mediocrity when you could be reading Kirby, Buscema, Simonson, Byrne, Perez, etc, at their peaks. There are some series that hold up to chronological readings even with creative team changes (I'd argue that Amazing Spider-Man holds up at least until the mid-80's, ranging from Lee/Ditko to Stern/JRJR) but I'm finding it much more enjoyable to just focus on the "good stuff" which is how I used to read comics when I was first getting into collecting trades and iconic creator runs.
|
|
|
Post by rberman on Jan 16, 2018 15:59:33 GMT -5
A technical question that perhaps has been answered elsewhere: I see a lot of high quality scans posted here. Where do they come from, and what is the best way to host them so that they don't become broken links within a couple of years? Do people scan them themselves on flatbed scanners?
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Jan 17, 2018 4:26:54 GMT -5
A technical question that perhaps has been answered elsewhere: I see a lot of high quality scans posted here. Where do they come from, and what is the best way to host them so that they don't become broken links within a couple of years? Do people scan them themselves on flatbed scanners? A scanner is always your best bet, but I snap my pictures with my phone and then just crop and adjust them on my desktop with Picasa. I then host them through Imgur.
|
|
|
Post by rberman on Mar 8, 2018 8:13:57 GMT -5
Quick question to all the reviewers. What do you get out of writing reviews? Why do you do it? Is it the enjoyment of the discussions the reviews spawn? Does being forced to slow down and really read the comics increase your appreciation for the material? Do you just love writing? Generally curious. Writing is my way of thinking about things that I like to think about. I also write music reviews for the same reason. I also like reading things other people have written about things that I like. I also like reading things that other people have written about me writing about like things that I like. So write about things, including responses to what I write about things! I don't care whether you agree or disagree; I just like the interaction.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on May 6, 2018 13:29:33 GMT -5
I've learned that with comics review threads, if I'm not invested in the creators, it's very hard to maintain interest. For a time I got overly fixated on reading chronologies, which, less face it, forces you to wade through a lot of mediocrity when you could be reading Kirby, Buscema, Simonson, Byrne, Perez, etc, at their peaks. There are some series that hold up to chronological readings even with creative team changes (I'd argue that Amazing Spider-Man holds up at least until the mid-80's, ranging from Lee/Ditko to Stern/JRJR) but I'm finding it much more enjoyable to just focus on the "good stuff" which is how I used to read comics when I was first getting into collecting trades and iconic creator runs. I go back and forth on this. Today I returned to my Batman reviews, which got old for me precisely because of what you say above. And yet, part of the charm of the reviews is that I never know what I'm going to get next; exploring the journey and progression of the series is sometimes just as satisfying as skipping to the good stuff that everyone already knows
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on May 6, 2018 14:10:03 GMT -5
Number one is great advice. It's something I struggle with. On one hand the really classic issues, those issues that most here probably know of simply because of their fame, probably don't need a detailed synopsis. Still, I must admit that I find it almost impossible to resist giving those issues that level of attention. And yet, if you end up writing a multi-paragraph synopsis that takes ten minutes to read, why wouldn't the reader just go read the original comic instead? I've seen an increasing number of review threads that are ALL synopsis with little to no commentary. I see them putting a lot of energy and work into the reviews, but I don't see the point. Why describe a panel or exchange when the reader can explore it for his/herself? I read review threads in order to learn more about the run in question -- not to be told, page by page, what happened in it. No disrespect to anyone who does this. I just don't see the point at all, and it saddens me because I see GREAT runs being summarized with GREAT enthusiasm, and I just wish there were reviews to go along with those summaries.
|
|
|
Post by rberman on May 6, 2018 19:31:25 GMT -5
Number one is great advice. It's something I struggle with. On one hand the really classic issues, those issues that most here probably know of simply because of their fame, probably don't need a detailed synopsis. Still, I must admit that I find it almost impossible to resist giving those issues that level of attention. And yet, if you end up writing a multi-paragraph synopsis that takes ten minutes to read, why wouldn't the reader just go read the original comic instead? I've seen an increasing number of review threads that are ALL synopsis with little to no commentary. I see them putting a lot of energy and work into the reviews, but I don't see the point. Why describe a panel or exchange when the reader can explore it for his/herself? I read review threads in order to learn more about the run in question -- not to be told, page by page, what happened in it. No disrespect to anyone who does this. I just don't see the point at all, and it saddens me because I see GREAT runs being summarized with GREAT enthusiasm, and I just wish there were reviews to go along with those summaries. I know what you mean and am open to feedback as to whether the level of detail in my summaries is too much or too little. In my mind, the summary exists to provide enough data to justify the conclusions in the analysis, rather than to recount every panel or page.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on May 6, 2018 19:43:17 GMT -5
And yet, if you end up writing a multi-paragraph synopsis that takes ten minutes to read, why wouldn't the reader just go read the original comic instead? I've seen an increasing number of review threads that are ALL synopsis with little to no commentary. I see them putting a lot of energy and work into the reviews, but I don't see the point. Why describe a panel or exchange when the reader can explore it for his/herself? I read review threads in order to learn more about the run in question -- not to be told, page by page, what happened in it. No disrespect to anyone who does this. I just don't see the point at all, and it saddens me because I see GREAT runs being summarized with GREAT enthusiasm, and I just wish there were reviews to go along with those summaries. I know what you mean and am open to feedback as to whether the level of detail in my summaries is too much or too little. In my mind, the summary exists to provide enough data to justify the conclusions in the analysis, rather than to recount every panel or page. I had no intention of calling anyone out, so to speak, but if you're asking, YES, I'd love to see more of an assessment of the work. What is significant about the issue? What trends are you noticing across issues? What are you seeing here that the casual reader might miss? That's the sort of thing I love reading in a review. Anyone can summarize a comic book; I want to read more than a paragraph of your unique thoughts about it.
|
|
|
Post by rberman on May 6, 2018 20:12:27 GMT -5
I know what you mean and am open to feedback as to whether the level of detail in my summaries is too much or too little. In my mind, the summary exists to provide enough data to justify the conclusions in the analysis, rather than to recount every panel or page. I had no intention of calling anyone out, so to speak, but if you're asking, YES, I'd love to see more of an assessment of the work. What is significant about the issue? What trends are you noticing across issues? What are you seeing here that the casual reader might miss? That's the sort of thing I love reading in a review. Anyone can summarize a comic book; I want to read more than a paragraph of your unique thoughts about it. I'm not offended. Looking over the "My Two Cents" sections of my New X-Men thread currently running, the length tends to be 200-400 words, occasionally as low as 100 or as high as 500. Do I have more than that to say on a given issue? Maybe. I'm trying to stick analysis of the overall themes and plot direction of each issue rather than analyzing the minutiae of either plot or art. I could probably do more of that if I posted more illustrative images. I notice that your Batman reviews have the cover image plus another six images typically. I limited my Astro City reviews to just a single image to summarize each issue, but my New X-Men reviews have had three images each from the interior, and never the cover. I was trying to mind your admonition in the beginning of this thread not to use too many images. But if you'd like more, I can comply.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on May 6, 2018 20:16:53 GMT -5
I'm not offended. Looking over the "My Two Cents" sections of my New X-Men thread currently running, the length tends to be 200-400 words, occasionally as low as 100 or as high as 500. Do I have more than that to say on a given issue? Maybe. I'm trying to stick analysis of the overall themes and plot direction of each issue rather than analyzing the minutiae of either plot or art. Just curious: why? I frequently worry that I'm using too many images. I do find they are immensely helpful for furnishing evidence of my point. I guess I use images the way you use your plot synopses; sort of a "before I read deeply into this, let me prove that I'm not making it up." Let me be clear that I express these desires as a member of the board, not as a staff member. You are free to write whatever you want so long as it complies with our Rules of the Road. But I'm willing to bet that going more in depth will get you more followers, more responses, and more satisfaction that you are creating something uniquely your own. I know I'll be more likely to follow along and comment.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on May 6, 2018 20:29:48 GMT -5
By the way, rberman, your review of Watchmen for the CCF Top 100 Sagas was pretty top notch. I particularly loved this portion: I'd love to see more of that level of analysis in your reviews.
|
|