|
Post by sunofdarkchild on Nov 11, 2015 1:54:53 GMT -5
To me the beginning of the end of the 'golden age' was when they brought back Jean Grey for X-Factor. Before that, when someone died they stayed dead (Gwen Stacey, Thunderbird), and changes were more or less permanent. This was the beginning of Marvel's 'going back to the status quo' because a writer or editor wanted things to go back to what it was like when they were kids, regardless of the quality of the story. So now, because one writer was a diehard Jean Grey fan, the most famous X-Men story to date is ruined by being about a 'fake,' the character of Cyclops is ruined and his growth since the DPS is thrown out, and Madelyn Prior is ruined in a hackneyed attempt to fix Cyclops. All this because some writers couldn't accept that Jean had died in a great story.
This trend of 'going back to square one' continued in New Mutants, where the same writer through out the great character development Claremont had spent years on with Magneto because she preferred him as a villain. This is where the trends that lead to crap like One More Day really started.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2015 2:12:32 GMT -5
To me the beginning of the end of the 'golden age' was when they brought back Jean Grey for X-Factor. Before that, when someone died they stayed dead (Gwen Stacey, Thunderbird), and changes were more or less permanent. This was the beginning of Marvel's 'going back to the status quo' because a writer or editor wanted things to go back to what it was like when they were kids, regardless of the quality of the story. So now, because one writer was a diehard Jean Grey fan, the most famous X-Men story to date is ruined by being about a 'fake,' the character of Cyclops is ruined and his growth since the DPS is thrown out, and Madelyn Prior is ruined in a hackneyed attempt to fix Cyclops. All this because some writers couldn't accept that Jean had died in a great story. This trend of 'going back to square one' continued in New Mutants, where the same writer through out the great character development Claremont had spent years on with Magneto because she preferred him as a villain. This is where the trends that lead to crap like One More Day really started. Oh permanent changes without returning to the status quo later like Doc Strange permanently losing his magical ability when the 1968 series was cancelled only to be given it back later when they wanted to launch a new Doctor Strange series, or Steve Rogers giving up Captain America to become Nomad because he was disillusioned with America only to return to the role later, or Adam Warlock returning from the dead so Starlin could use him again in the Avengers/Marvel Two-in-One Annual or.... part and parcel of ongoing mainstream shared universe Marvel comics from early on, way before the Phoenix saga redux to launch X-Factor (or even the All New All Different X-Men itself) was done. Certainly the return of Jean Grey was a poor decision, but that kind of undo things to get back to status quo had been going on in the Marvel Universe for ages, it wasn't a product of the 80s and if its use signalled the decline of MArvle than that happened sometime in the early Bronze Age...not when FF #286 came out. -M
|
|
|
Post by sunofdarkchild on Nov 11, 2015 2:37:05 GMT -5
Even still, before Jean characters were expected to stay dead, and if a character who was a villain became a hero (half of the Avengers) they stayed heroes. A lot of changes are temporary as a matter of course (like Storm losing her powers), but truly major ones like marriage, death, and heel turns should not be. And even then, bringing characters back is a problem when it is done for the wrong reasons (fanboyism) instead of having a good story to tell.
|
|
|
Post by tingramretro on Nov 11, 2015 2:51:56 GMT -5
For me, Marvel started coming apart with Secret Wars in '84, it's when the shared universe and continuity trumped story, and the beginning of the big event cycle that has snowballed since then. There were still a lot of good things going on, but it was the beginning of the end, a harbinger of things to come. Marvel started taking its cues from that instead of from what had made it so good for so long-we see it take root in the later Shooter era and into the DeFalco and Harras eras as well, until it reaches full blossom and decay that has pretty much tainted everything since then. Instead of story driving books and leading to connections, they got it ass backwards and started with the connections and tried to force stories from there. Marketing began to drive direction instead of promoting the good stories they were doing. It all starts with Shooter and his Secret War. -M I see it completely the other way around. When I started reading Marvel in the 70s, everything was connected, there was a strong sense of a single cohesive universe where you could follow any given character's life from year to year, book to book, appearance to appearance, and it would all make sense-that was part of what hooked me! When it started to fall apart was when that cohesive universe began to come unglued, as too many books by too many writers unwilling to do basic research led to the gradual abandonment of that tight continuity, something that has now reached the point where pretty much nothing makes sense anymore in the Marvel Universe as far as its history is concerned. Also, of course, as a fourteen year old, I thought Secret Wars was the absolute most exciting thing ever in Marvel comics (except for Captain Britain), and I still love it.
|
|
|
Post by Dizzy D on Nov 11, 2015 4:40:06 GMT -5
Even still, before Jean characters were expected to stay dead, and if a character who was a villain became a hero (half of the Avengers) they stayed heroes. A lot of changes are temporary as a matter of course (like Storm losing her powers), but truly major ones like marriage, death, and heel turns should not be. And even then, bringing characters back is a problem when it is done for the wrong reasons (fanboyism) instead of having a good story to tell. I agree on death, I don't agree on marriage (I believe 30% is the current divorce rate?) and face/heel turns and vice versa, depends too much on circumstances to me. I felt that Magneto turn back to "villainy" during the Claremont/Lee issues was pretty good: he tried to do good, but felt more and more ineffectual while stakes kept getting higher, which comes to a head with Zaladane. Back on topic: I really can't decide on a best decade, every decade has things I loved and things I didn't care for.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,199
|
Post by Confessor on Nov 11, 2015 6:41:58 GMT -5
For me, Marvel started coming apart with Secret Wars in '84, it's when the shared universe and continuity trumped story, and the beginning of the big event cycle that has snowballed since then. There were still a lot of good things going on, but it was the beginning of the end, a harbinger of things to come. Marvel started taking its cues from that instead of from what had made it so good for so long-we see it take root in the later Shooter era and into the DeFalco and Harras eras as well, until it reaches full blossom and decay that has pretty much tainted everything since then. Instead of story driving books and leading to connections, they got it ass backwards and started with the connections and tried to force stories from there. Marketing began to drive direction instead of promoting the good stories they were doing. It all starts with Shooter and his Secret War. -M I see it completely the other way around. When I started reading Marvel in the 70s, everything was connected, there was a strong sense of a single cohesive universe where you could follow any given character's life from year to year, book to book, appearance to appearance, and it would all make sense-that was part of what hooked me! When it started to fall apart was when that cohesive universe began to come unglued, as too many books by too many writers unwilling to do basic research led to the gradual abandonment of that tight continuity, something that has now reached the point where pretty much nothing makes sense anymore in the Marvel Universe as far as its history is concerned. Also, of course, as a fourteen year old, I thought Secret Wars was the absolute most exciting thing ever in Marvel comics (except for Captain Britain), and I still love it. I don't know about it being "the absolute most exciting thing ever in Marvel comics", but I was 12 when the original Secret Wars came out and I definitely thought it was very cool. These days I can still enjoy it for what it is: big, dumb, superhero fun. Nothing more, nothing less.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,865
|
Post by shaxper on Nov 11, 2015 9:13:54 GMT -5
I see it completely the other way around. When I started reading Marvel in the 70s, everything was connected, there was a strong sense of a single cohesive universe where you could follow any given character's life from year to year, book to book, appearance to appearance, and it would all make sense-that was part of what hooked me! When it started to fall apart was when that cohesive universe began to come unglued, as too many books by too many writers unwilling to do basic research led to the gradual abandonment of that tight continuity, something that has now reached the point where pretty much nothing makes sense anymore in the Marvel Universe as far as its history is concerned. Also, of course, as a fourteen year old, I thought Secret Wars was the absolute most exciting thing ever in Marvel comics (except for Captain Britain), and I still love it. I don't know about it being "the absolute most exciting thing ever in Marvel comics", but I was 12 when the original Secret Wars came out and I definitely thought it was very cool. These days I can still enjoy it for what it is: big, dumb, superhero fun. Nothing more, nothing less. I always maintain that Secret Wars was EXACTLY like the kind of stories my adolescent self was battling out with my action figures at the time. It's so perfectly juvenile in its concept and execution. I love it because I WAS a juvenile when I read it. Had I come across it as an adult, I probably would have hated it.
|
|
|
Post by sunofdarkchild on Nov 11, 2015 9:23:32 GMT -5
Secret Wars was one of those things that worked at the time but when they tried to replicate it they usually didn't get what made it work in the first place, like Watchmen (not comparing their quality, just the subsequent bandwagon).
|
|
|
Post by dbutler69 on Nov 11, 2015 10:54:44 GMT -5
Oh, I loved Secret Wars when it first came out, and re-reading it a couple of years ago, I still enjoyed it, though it probably was a harbinger of many negative developments in comics. Like shaxper says, if it had come out when I was an adult instead of a 15 year old, maybe I'd hate it.
|
|
|
Post by tingramretro on Nov 11, 2015 13:30:10 GMT -5
Secret Wars was one of those things that worked at the time but when they tried to replicate it they usually didn't get what made it work in the first place, like Watchmen (not comparing their quality, just the subsequent bandwagon). I don't think you can really compare Watchmen with Secret Wars in any meaningful way. They were totally different types of story aimed at totally different audiences and intended to provoke totally different responses, in my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2015 13:40:17 GMT -5
For me, Marvel started coming apart with Secret Wars in '84, it's when the shared universe and continuity trumped story, and the beginning of the big event cycle that has snowballed since then. There were still a lot of good things going on, but it was the beginning of the end, a harbinger of things to come. Marvel started taking its cues from that instead of from what had made it so good for so long-we see it take root in the later Shooter era and into the DeFalco and Harras eras as well, until it reaches full blossom and decay that has pretty much tainted everything since then. Instead of story driving books and leading to connections, they got it ass backwards and started with the connections and tried to force stories from there. Marketing began to drive direction instead of promoting the good stories they were doing. It all starts with Shooter and his Secret War. -M I see it completely the other way around. When I started reading Marvel in the 70s, everything was connected, there was a strong sense of a single cohesive universe where you could follow any given character's life from year to year, book to book, appearance to appearance, and it would all make sense-that was part of what hooked me! When it started to fall apart was when that cohesive universe began to come unglued, as too many books by too many writers unwilling to do basic research led to the gradual abandonment of that tight continuity, something that has now reached the point where pretty much nothing makes sense anymore in the Marvel Universe as far as its history is concerned. Also, of course, as a fourteen year old, I thought Secret Wars was the absolute most exciting thing ever in Marvel comics (except for Captain Britain), and I still love it. See before Secret Wars, you could read an entire year of, say Avengers, and it might have a big epic storyline and you might get a panel of oh the Bxter Building is empty because the FF is away so the Avengers a have to deal with it and a panel of a split face Peter Parker/Spider-Man shot with spider-sense going off to tell you it was a big deal felt across the MU and a note that Thor was unavailable because he was on some quest in Asgard, but everything you needed for the story was in Avengers, and if you didn't read Thor, FF and Spidey it didn't detract from your enjoyment of Avengers and if those 2 panels and notes were absent it wouldn't have affected the story at all. You could then read Spider-Man and get another epic storyline and not need to read the other Marvel books to enjoy it, but you might get little nods (Spidey looking to the Baxter Building or some such) to the shared universe but it was about the Spider-Man story in the Spider-Man book. You could then read X-Men and get yet another major epic stoyline independent of the others with maybe a nod to other stuff (say a paenl of Beast trying to contact the Avengers and Jarvis saying they are busy dealing with blah blah blah, but it didn't impact the story being told. Once in a while you might get a cross-ver 2 parter or a guest star appearance, but it was about the book it was being told in, not about something else. Spidey might run into Daredevil tracking down a street level criminal in his attempt to find the plan of the super-villain he was fighting, and they team up for an issue, but it moved the SPider-Man story alonfg and didn't interrupt the story being told in Daredevil. The events of the story led to the signs connectivity and the ideas of a shared universe enriched the stories being told, but the focus was on the story being told in each book. Spider-Man creators worried about telling Spider-Man stories. X-Men writers worried about telling X-Men stories. Avengers teams Avengers stories etc. So you had lots of good, organic stories being told, each was a thread in the tapestry, sure, but the focus was on telling good stories about the characters in each title and letting the stories go where they will, finding points of connectivity where you can. With Secret Wars and it ensuing effects, that was no more. It became about telling stories about the shared connectivity and fitting in stories about the characters where they could be crammed in. If that X-Men story (which would be a great X-Men story) doesn't fit what editorial wants to do with Spider-Man or Avengers or Thor or what have you, then there is no chance it will be told. Connectivity trumped storytelling and the characters. It became about the world, not the individual stories in the world. Yes we all love big stories, they were something special, and Secret Wars may have felt special because it was out of the ordinary at the time, but then it became the norm, and if it was the norm, there was no longer room for the types of individual stories featuring the characters and their big epic stories that had defined the Marvel line before Secret Wars and made it the House of Ideas people had come to know and love. It was no longer about telling great SPider-Man epics and X-Men epics and Avengers epics, and Thor epics but about telling one single narrative that fit all those pieces but was really about none of them, it was about the sum, not the parts any more, but then the parts become interchangeable and unimportant. And that was the beginning of the end for me, the company didn't want me to care about each book, or to find parts of the line I really dug, it wanted me to buy into these big broad brushstrokes that swept the entire thing into one single whole that I had to follow all of or couldn't follow any of. By the 90s every book was getting interrupted by the Infinity event of the year, and the annuals were no longer about the title characters but big sweeping stories about the universe, and an X-Men story was a mutant universe story that could tie into other books in the Marvel line (things like Fall of the Mutants crossed into Daredevil I think), and a Spider-Man story involved 5 or 6 different books not one book telling a Spidey story (or 2 or 3 different books telling their own Spidey stories like MTU, ASM and Spectacular as had been), and Avengers stories had to encompass the solo books for all the members (and things like Galactic Storm had even further reach) then we started getting specials and one shots to stat and end stories that would then cross over through swaths of books (Age of Apocalypse, Maximum Clonage, The Crossing, Timeslide, then it became special mini-series to tell these big stories and the individual books would tell spin-off stories (House of M, Civil War, AvX, etc.) until we got to the point where the Avengers book was not about telling Avengers stories but was a ancillary thing to tell Marvel stories, and the X-Men comic wasn't about telling X-Men stories but about mutant stories and how they fit into the Marvel story, and Spider-Man... Until we got to the point (Secret Wars) where every story, every book, was about telling stories about the Marvel World (or universe) not about the wonderful characters who make up the world, not about the interesting stories about those characters creators might have, but about the worldbuilding and the inter-connectivity of it all. Marvel had lost what made Marvel, Marvel. It wasn't the universe and connectivity, it was the stories featuring the great characters of the Marvel stable, yes at times crossing over, but standing on their own and having great stories told about them. Look at the books that are resonating (not selling well, but resonating with those who read them) today-books like Ms. Marvel and such. They are going back to the things that made Marvel great int he Silver and Bronze age-telling stories about a character, showing their trials and tribulations, not throwing as many costumes and powers into a fight to see if you can top sales charts. But hey, that's just me and my take. If the universe is more important to you than the characters and their stories, if you enjoy what I consider soulless event stories with interchangeable parts wearing gaudy costumes and acting "out of character" to fit the needs of the ridiculous marketing driven plots, more power to you. Enjoy. I'll go back and read the stuff I like, and that's mostly pre-Shooter Secret Wars. -M
|
|
|
Post by tingramretro on Nov 11, 2015 14:43:53 GMT -5
Wow. Judgemental or what. So sorry I dared to like a story you didn't.
|
|
|
Post by Cei-U! on Nov 11, 2015 14:52:48 GMT -5
What mrp said. Secret Wars (along with the Marvel Universe Handbook) was the herald of the fetishization of the shared universe (or, as I've come to think of it, the Gruendwaldization of the MU). That's the trend that shortly drove me away from Marvel and, except for the Busiek/Perez Avengers, has kept me away (though the resurrection of Jean Gray was the specific final straw).
Cei-U! I summon the turning point!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2015 15:04:47 GMT -5
Wow. Judgemental or what. So sorry I dared to like a story you didn't. You can like or read or buy whatever you like, I don't care, not every comic is for me and I know and accept that. I just think post-Secret Wars Marvel is as huge step down form the way things were done before and the fact that this type of storytelling has transitioned actual comic books (not comic stories in other mediums) from a mass medium to a niche medium in the 30 years since it came out is not a good thing as far as I am concerned. -M
|
|
|
Post by Paste Pot Paul on Nov 11, 2015 15:08:19 GMT -5
I'm quite torn on this one, but have opted for the 70s in the end. The era I grew up with, and it is extremely influential in my choices of favourite characters and creators. The 70s gave me - Captain America by Englehart and Sal Buscema
- Conan by Roy Thomas, John Buscema, and Ernie Chan
- Master of Kung Fu by Doug Moench and Paul Gulacy
- Captain Marvel by Jim Starlin
- Marvel Two-In-One by Benjamin Grimm
- Astonishing Tales by Deathlok (Rich Buckler)
- Uncanny X-Men by Len Wein and Dave Cockrum
- Daredevil by Frank Miller
- Incredible Hulk by Sal Buscema
- The Defenders by Steve Gerber and Sal Buscema
- Tomb of Dracula by Marv Wolfman and Gene Colan
- The return of the King
Along with the above creative teams i got Killraven, Skull, White Tiger, Thundra, Falcon, and Nova. Sure the 80s stepped it up a gear at times, and the 60s were Kirby mainlining a cosmos all his own, but I came to all that later. The 70s, and Marvel made me the fan I still am.
|
|