|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Nov 7, 2015 7:31:09 GMT -5
I Know that Mr. Hyde is big but...  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2015 10:07:37 GMT -5
There have been many fine contributions to this thread, but I think you'll agree this one is hard to top*. I present to you, the last panel of Avengers v2 #1, featuring the adventures of Pony Girl - half horse's rear end, half human woman complete with 18 feet long legs and unfeasibly articulated spinal column  * just hoping no-one else has already posted it. Because, really, once is enough, right? |
|
|
|
Post by Prince Hal on Nov 7, 2015 10:51:55 GMT -5
That Enchantress panel looks like Liefeld attempting to channel Bill Ward.
|
|
|
|
Post by MDG on Nov 7, 2015 12:26:50 GMT -5
That Enchantress panel looks like Liefeld attempting to channel Bill Ward. Ward's women are realistic next to this. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2015 12:28:57 GMT -5
Liefeld's proportions are too overly exaggerated. The Enchantress figure looks great from the mid-section up, but those elongated legs...wtf is going on there??? Also, not even Barbie has a waist that small!
|
|
|
|
Post by Prince Hal on Nov 7, 2015 12:30:24 GMT -5
That Enchantress panel looks like Liefeld attempting to channel Bill Ward. Ward's women are realistic next to this. I did say "attempting."  |
|
|
|
Post by Prince Hal on Nov 7, 2015 12:30:51 GMT -5
Liefeld's proportions are too overly exaggerated. The Enchantress figure looks great from the waist up, but those elongated legs...wtf is going on there??? Also, not even Barbie has a waist that small! Except that she has no spine. |
|
|
|
Post by Roquefort Raider on Nov 7, 2015 12:35:27 GMT -5
There have been many fine contributions to this thread, but I think you'll agree this one is hard to top*. I present to you, the last panel of Avengers v2 #1, featuring the adventures of Pony Girl - half horse's rear end, half human woman complete with 18 feet long legs and unfeasibly articulated spinal column * just hoping no-one else has already posted it. Because, really, once is enough, right? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2015 12:50:09 GMT -5
Liefeld's proportions are too overly exaggerated. The Enchantress figure looks great from the mid-section up, but those elongated legs...wtf is going on there??? Also, not even Barbie has a waist that small! I'd say exaggerated to the point of hideous. It burns the skin from my eyes. It's why I own ZERO of Liefeld's books. |
|
|
|
Post by Arthur Gordon Scratch on Nov 7, 2015 14:03:39 GMT -5
What's really baffling in that page is that the character screams of sexual energy, everything in her outfit is aimed at seduction, yet, as a reverse mantis, the very act of sexual intercourse would surely kill her.
I'm a proud owner of all Alan Moore's work on Awesome (Supreme, Judgement Day, etc), and some of it features Lieffeld. Whats great is in some of it, Moore aknowledges within the story the tropes inherent to the 90ies that Liefeld embodies like no one else. And those are indeed mighty good stories. Furthermore, I still can't fathom how Liefeld handed over the reins of Supreme to Brandon Graham...
|
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Nov 7, 2015 17:03:11 GMT -5
I think she was standing in front of a fun house mirror in that panel.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2015 17:32:34 GMT -5
Just for a lark I fixed the proportions of Liefeld's Enchantress. The waist is still too thin, but here is what it would look like if the legs were not elongated all to hell.  |
|
|
|
Post by the4thpip on Nov 7, 2015 17:48:13 GMT -5
Is it me or is her neck not resting on the middle spot between her shoulders at all?
|
|
|
|
Post by Reptisaurus! on Nov 7, 2015 18:03:19 GMT -5
I really like the "camera" work in the Loki panels, though!
|
|
|
|
Post by adamwarlock2099 on Nov 7, 2015 18:25:52 GMT -5
What none you guys like dames with legs that won't quit?
|
|
