shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,867
|
Post by shaxper on Jun 5, 2023 16:25:21 GMT -5
Superman: The Man of Steel #10 (April 1992) "Tidal Wave!" Script: Louise Simonson Pencils: Jon Bogdanove (layouts); Dennis Janke (finishes) Inks: Dennis Janke Colors: Glenn Whitmore Letters: Bill Oakley Grade: B Well, you've got an epic event storyline starring all the DC heroes (even if it's only happening in the Superman titles), you've got an endless hoard of bad guys, and you've got almost non-stop action, issue after issue. The Superman Office clearly wanted this to be counted among DC's biggest events, making nods to both Crisis on Infinite Earths and Invasion early on ( Superman #65), and here it tries to emulate what was arguably CoIE's biggest, best-remembered moment (though I personally felt Barry Allen's death even more). The problem is that the original story marked the death of Supergirl. I mean...it's Supergirl. Everyone knew Supergirl, so the death clearly mattered. On the other hand, who the hell cared about Draaga? It's a safe, consequence-less death for the DCU. Sure, Simonson and Bogdanove do their best to make us actually start caring about Draaga in this issue, suddenly revealing a budding romance between him and Matrix: but we're first experiencing these moments after seeing the cover; after already knowing he was going to die. Thus, I'm not exactly shedding tears over this death: ...and neither is anyone else. The story just sort of moves on after that moment, Draaga's death/sacrifice not even getting acknowledged until three pages later. Even then, no one seems to care all that much, and Matrix has already resolved to avenge him, depriving us of any opportunity to share in her grief and...ya know...actually feel something about this death. Wearing the body of your dead lover? It's less touching and more creepy, as far as I'm concerned. Beyond Draaga's death, this story continues to be mindless action and little else. For one thing, Brainiac's entire goal appears to be shrinking down the cities of Earth and crushing them for fun. I mean...why? and the logic lapses, conveniences, and other signs of lazy writing continue to be prevalent. For example, Jimmy Olsen's helicopter has to crash just to give Aquaman something to do in this issue: A planet-wide invasion is still only taking place in Metropolis for some reason, speedsters are still insultingly under-estimated, and Superman is smart enough to figure out that the devices worn on people's heads is what is giving Brainiac control over them, but he's not smart enough to--I don't know--shoot them with his heat vision and free them all from a safe distance without the need for a fight? The man has flight, super speed, and near invulnerability in addition to countless other abilities that a brilliant mind like his should be able to use creatively here, but of course he needs to be seen grunting and struggling against every adversary. Really, the only intelligent contribution that this issue makes to an already stupid (but fun!) story is its subtle revision of Maxima. Whereas she could have easily been used as the lovesick girl villain archtype of the Silver Age who would make certain that, if she couldn't have her man, then noone could, Simonson explores Maxima's desire to marry Superman with greater complexity and sophistication: This is not a lovesick space bimbo. This is a leader doing what she must to protect her people. Beyond that, there isn't much to say. Sure, Panic in the Sky is proving to be a little stupid, but it's also entertaining. Had it not been confined to the Superman titles, I think it would be remembered as one of DC's better company-wide events. Of course, that isn't saying much.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,867
|
Post by shaxper on Jun 8, 2023 9:51:45 GMT -5
Adventures of Superman #489 (April 1992) "Panic in the Sky Epilogue: Hail the Conquering Heroes" Script: Jerry Ordway Pencils: Tom Grummett Inks: Doug Hazlewood Colors: Glenn Whitmore Letters: Albert DeGuzman Grade: B- If last issue's falling action felt awkward, that's probably because there wasn't supposed to be any. Apparently, that issue was supposed to end with the climactic moment of Brainiac getting lobotomized and unleashing that metal orb thing that hasn't gotten explained yet and the moments afterward were supposed to be told here, in the epilogue. Thus we get this moment at the start of this issue, in which Maxima is crying for Brainiac's blood: which absolutely does not match the final subdued moment we had last issue: Furthermore, Brainiac has apparently destroyed Maxima's home planet now: when Almerac was very much alive just two issues back: It's truly frustrating to see an office once so remarkable for its coordination stumbling this badly. Clearly, the decision has been made by this point to move Maxima into Justice League, and her planet needs to be dead for that to happen (otherwise wouldn't she just return home?), except the entire reason Brainiac had been able to control her throughout this story was because she feared what he might due to her planet. If he was going to destroy it, we really needed to be shown that. Heck, it would have been a more believable reason for why Maxima suddenly turned on him late in the story. Speaking of poor coordination, you've got to love how Superman doesn't hesitate to install a puppet government on Warworld without a second thought, instructing them to choose their leaders differently next time: So I guess we're just going to ignore the lesson Superman learned from interfering with the regime of the terrorist nation of Qurac way back in Adventures of Superman #427? It's not like the Superman office was still exploring the repercussions of that single event three years later or anything: from Adventures of Superman #471. Granted, the story above was written by Bill Messner-Loebs (fill-in writer), and Marv Wolfman (long gone by this point) was the one to originally write the Qurac episode and explore its aftermath, but Roger Stern (still very much one fourth of the Superman office) certainly revisited its implications during his Action Comics Weekly stretch: from Action Comics Weekly #639Maybe the difference is that Warworld's leader was directly responsible for the threat against innocent people this time? Maybe the difference is that they're aliens and not an anaologue for a real-world nation, or maybe Ordway just didn't give a f**k. Anyway, Dan Jurgens' words about this storyline weighed on me quite a bit as I read this final issue. Specifically his statement that: "The story came about when I mentioned a problem Superman and most other super-hero books had. It seemed to me heroes consistently waited far too long before responding to threats. For example, a monster destroys half a city and then the hero responds... Superman had been guilty of this for some time, always reacting rather than acting. It seemed to me that we could reestablish Superman as the preeminent hero in the DC pantheon if he would first recognize an approaching threat, and then gather an army of heroes to combat the threat before it got to Earth." As provided by chadwilliamOkay, so Superman is all about taking the fight to the hostile invader before he comes to Earth, and you've got Orion, Lightray, and Metron right there, so why is he installing them as puppet governers on Warworld instead of saying, "Hey, why don't we take the fight to Darkseid next? After Legends a few years back, you know it's just a matter of time before he comes for Earth again, and I clearly no longer have any qualms with disrupting the internal politics of other nations/planets." But I suppose that if you take Superman too far down the road of bringing the fight to the enemy before the enemy brings the fight to you, we're going to end up with something out of Frank Miller or Alan Moore; a super-powered bully just kicking enemy rulers' teeth in when they refuse to sign non-aggression pacts with Earth. Anyway, it's clear that the main reason why this epilogue was needed was because the Superman Office needed to show Superman arriving at this conclusion in order to justify him and Maxima joining the Justice League this same month: Incidentally, I don't intend to include those stories in my reviews unless anyone here thinks they'll matter in terms of Superman continuity.However, I will admit that I was confused by this portion of Superman's speech: What was going on with the League at this point? The comic was still hitting stands each month. I really should get back to my Justice League in the Post-Crisis Era review thread sooner or later. Beyond all this, we finally return to the Superman Office's default structure of exploring multiple character arcs at one time, with Matrix deciding to remain as Supergirl: I am REALLY glad we moved away from the creepy idea of her wearing Draaga's body as a means of somehow honoring her deceased almost-lover.Jimmy Olsen's obnoxious story arc coming to an end with his return to the Daily Planet: and Professor Hamilton randomly remembering that he forgot a critically important promise he made two frickin' years earlier: Look, I get it. There was a short time in which George Perez was gone, and all the remaining writers were free to write whatever Superman stories they felt like writing, and then suddenly someone decided that they should start writing interconnected crossover after interconnected crossover. And then, when those were done, the last minute decision to create a 4th Superman title (as well as other factors that I strong suspect included the original plot for Time and Time Again becoming Armageddon 2001, requiring a whole new crossover to be planned at the last moment--but I won't get into all that again) created massive delays and last minute scrambling in 1991. So now that the big crossover for 1992 is concluded, Ordway is getting right back to that story. Fine. That makes sense, but couldn't we be shown that the professor had been working on fulfilling his promise all along and just not getting anywhere until now? It's deeply troubling to see a character we love be so absent-minded and blasé about another innocent character's fate. Anyway, Ordway wastes no time in thrusting us into this new story arc that has nothing to do with Panic in the Sky. Parts are downright amusing in a way that only Ordway can make them while others are so steeped in forgettable continuity from two full years (and 92 full issues!) earlier that even I barely know what the hell he's talking about: I will say that it's a bit ironic, at the tail end of a story that so deliberately invoked both Crisis on Infinite Earths and Invasion by name, to meet a character named Flashpoint: Important Details:1. Matrix decides to remain as Supergirl. 2. Brainiac has been lobotomized. Minor Details:1. Orion and Lightray now rule Warworld, and Metron is in possession of Brainiac. 2. Stop trying to sell us on Deathstroke as a hero just because the fanboys love him: He certainly had no qualms about repeatedly trying to kill a certain other green kid who was only a few years older than that. 3. Okay, so Luthor organizes a parade to celebrate Earth's victory against the invaders, and THEN the heroes come through the boomtube unexpectedly: So how did Luthor know the invasion was over? How embarrassing would it have been if he organized a victory parade in the middle of a lull while Brainiac was warming up some huge death beam that was going to rip into Metropolis a few pages later? 4. the letters page is still adamantly insisting that Lex Luthor I is really and truly dead. (as always, no spoilers on this one, please). 5. In fact, the letters page is a virtual treasure trove of minor details this time around. For example, I hadn't realized that we never ever saw Tiny Bubbles (Manheim's girlfriend)'s face: 6. And this little bit of trivia is somewhat disturbing: So they branded her? Like, Superman owns that particular farm animal now? Why aren't they drawing an LL into his curls? Up until now, I've been really impressed with the equality these writers have given to Clark and Lois's relationship, but this little detail really bothers me.
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Jun 14, 2023 23:01:20 GMT -5
Superman #67 (May 1992) So, in the wake of a major Superman event in which the villain never had a clear goal nor plan, and his threat to Earth was undefined and existential at best, Jurgens is going to give us a done-in-one story in which that same villain's B plan is a clear danger to Earth and seems far more threatening than that other never explained thing he spent eight issues never getting around to doing. Weirder still, while Panic in the Sky took great pains to explain that absolutely nobody died and the damage was minimal, we've got people dying left and right this time around Seems like the Superman books would do that a lot in those days. Something would happen in one book, and a week later another book would say contradict it as if it had never happened. Although usually, it seemed to be whenever a book had something, anything, that might be even slightly moving toward the ballpark of edgy, another book would turn right around and soften it up. This case is a rare reversal, I think. Look, I'm as big a fan of diversity and inclusion as anyone, but how come every time new minor characters are introduced in Suicide Slum lately, it's a black guy and a white guy? In one of those panels, they look kind of like Lenny and Carl from The Simpsons. And in another panel, they look liked Lenny and Carl race-swapped. So there's some diversity for you. I'm really surprised that Jurgens gives such a big shout-out to Singles (1992), a film that I adored so much as a teenager that I wore out my VHS tape from repeated viewings and had to buy another. It wasn't exactly a major film that general audiences would know/care about, and it doesn't have any relation to Superman nor to comics in general. Did Jurgens perhaps know writer/producer Cameron Crowe? Crowe was writing for Rolling Stone prior to shifting into film, so perhaps a magazine writer and a comic artist crossed paths somewhere? Could be that Jurgens likes some alternative music. But later he was referencing Van Halen long after Van Halen had gone radio-friendly, so this seems like an isolated case. The books also referenced the Spin Doctors, but I'm pretty sure that only because of their album Pocketful of Kryptonite and its song "Jimmy Olsen's Blues." And when the books later featured punk bands and name-checked the "riot grrrls" trend, it seemed like another case of just trying to latch onto something hip right as it stopped being hip. All of which leads me to think that the "Singles" bit was a product placement. After all, it was a Warner Brothers movie.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,867
|
Post by shaxper on Jun 21, 2023 13:53:57 GMT -5
Adventures of Superman #490 (May 1992) "Blood and Sand" Script: Jerry Ordway Pencils: Tom Grummett Inks: Trevor Scott Colors: Glenn Whitmore Letters: Albert DeGuzman Grade: B- Three things I've come to expect from Ordway since at least Action Comics #650: Humor, heavy continuity, and characters bonding in surprisingly heart-warming ways. We get all three in this story, which is essentially Clark, Jimmy, Prof. Hamilton, and Husque on a road-trip to pursue a plot point from four years earlier. It's...adorable. Ordway seems truly obsessed with building a loving supporting universe for Clark/Superman far more than his colleagues. He's the one who developed Bibbo into a meaningful part of Superman's universe, made Bibbo's bar a sort of home to our supporting cast, and really built up Prof. Emil and his relationship with Mildred Krantz, as well. A comment is made in this story about Superman having so many wonderful friends, and I feel it. That being said, the plot, itself, is a bit of a mess. It takes most of the issue to finally get to it, and then Superman literally sweeps in and beats the bad guys in four panels. Here's two of them: A lot of carefully considered ideas about Exiles wanting to be hybrids with humans, experimentation, past history of human scientists working alongside Exiles (sometimes unwillingly) and whatever the hell they did to Husque's sister, Terah (last seen in Adventures of Superman #443 and NOT The New Teen Titans' Judas Contract), gets thrown at us very quickly and with absolutely no subtlety nor consideration for pacing, leaving me with pretty much the same final reaction as Prof. Emil: To be fair, given the choice between more pages of this or seeing Husque sitting awkwardly in a hotel lobby and having Prof. Emil complain about the air conditioner in the van blowing up his shorts, I'll happily take the latter. Another important aspect of this story worth discussing is Ordway revisiting Superman's decision to be a citizen of the world with no special allegience to the US government, from back in Superman #53. This issue begins with Superman busting through a bunker in Qurac, making us wonder how Ordway continues to forget the harsh lesson about interfering in another country's politics without first doing his homework that Superman learned waaaaay back in Adventures of Superman #427 (I pointed out his seeming to forget this just last issue), but it turns out that first panel was a trick on Ordway's part: The soldiers Superman has come to stop are Americans illegally operating on Qurac soil: In fact, the Sons of Liberty group at work here (incidentally the same group that's about to destroy Pete Ross's career) were last seen in that very same Superman #53. Funny, then, that Ordway remembers this message so well and so painstakingly revisits continuity from that era, and then has Superman demand that the villain he's Scooby-Dooing speak English: Presumably as part of his desire to be a citizen of the world, we saw Superman picking up numerous languages at around the same time that he made his big decision. I find it hard to believe that he wouldn't have chosen Qurac's language as one of the first to learn after all the embarrasment and resentment his previous intervention on their soil had caused. from Adventures of Superman #471Demanding the villain speak English feels more than a little nationalistic; certainly not the citizen of the world image Supes is trying to cultivate, here. Finally, this issue offers some minor developments for new character Ron Troupe and his boss, Collin Thornton. Much as with the Lana and Pete subplot, we've been given no reason to care about these characters other than the fact that Ordway has chosen to give them pages in this issue. Worse yet, I can't help but wonder if Ron's angry sister (first appearing in this issue) isn't more right than even she realizes: Is this character being shoved down our throats just because the franchise needed a Black character? It was a bit ironic learning last issue that Clark Kent's role model is Atticus Finch in a story/office in which no significant Black characters exist. We've been repeatedly shown many Black characters living in Metropolis, so why doesn't one fit somewhere into the fabric of this loving supporting cast Ordway is championing? How come the new Black guy feels obligatory and uninteresting when so many others can feel so real and alive in these pages? As for Collin Thornton, he stopped mattering as soon as Jimmy Olsen stopped working for him (and even that wasn't interesting). Why the hell should we care that his paper is about to fall under Luthor II's control? Does Luthor II really need a newspaper to sway how people think at this point? Doesn't Lexcorp have its own television station, or did I just make that up? Important Details:1. Okay, I'm mad. For YEARS now, this office has followed the policy that a month in our world generally equals a week in Superman's world. It's a tidy, easy way to explain why our characters aren't aging quickly as well as why it can take multiple issues to resolve a plot point. But either associate editor Dan Thorsland doesn't understand that, or this office has fallen off the wagon: Clark and Lois got engaged at the end of Superman #50 (December 1990). Seventeen months have passed in realtime since the publication of that issue, which should mean approximately seventeen weeks (about four months) for Superman, so where did those other two months go?? Minor Details:1. We FINALLY see the infamous cape pouch that I've never been able to envision, in which Superman keeps his Clark Kent clothes: I would have imagined it closer to the small of his back, where it would be out of sight and unlikely to get accidentally snatched by a villain trying to grab him or even snagged on a tree branch. Apparently, Grummett agrees, because that same damn pouch is gone in literally the next frame: 2. Mr. Harriman is mighty surprised that Pete Ross didn't decide to vote his way ...but Pete outright told him this last week: and whereas we were led to believe there was something insideous about Lana's new job in that story: it turns out they just thought they were rewarding Pete for his cooperation (even after they knew he wasn't going to cooperate?). Let's process this... Harriman: Vote no on the gun bill.
Pete: No.
Harriman: Have it your way. I'm going to punish you by giving your fiance a cushy job. MWAHAHAHAHA!Clearly, some lines of communication got crossed between last issue and this one. 3. The constant references in this office to events from multiple years back can feel oppressive at times, but it's also pretty darn cool when you go back and look at the actual story being referenced: This issueFour years earlierI have no idea why this fills me with such joy, but it does. Maybe it helps to make these comics feel more real, somehow.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,867
|
Post by shaxper on Aug 24, 2023 12:39:43 GMT -5
Adventures of Superman #491 (June 1992) "A Good Head on Your Shoulders" Script: Jerry Ordway Pencils: Tom Grummett Inks: Doug Hazlewood Colors: Glenn Whitmore Letters: Albert DeGuzman Grade: C- I honestly went back to check the credits on this one several times. Cerberus is Louise Simonson's baby, and has been so ever since she came aboard with Superman: The Man of Steel #1. And while she has been writing generally awkward, poorly constructed stories while Jon Bogdanove draws them generally awkwardly and poorly to match, Ordway has been churning out meaningful stories that emphasize the heart and relationships among this franchise's large cast of characters while Grummett draws them adequately. But, suddenly, we have Ordway writing a big Cerberus story...awkwardly and poorly. Let's start with the big solution to the threat of Metallo in this issue. In case you missed it, Superman is unable to harm him even when he lets loose his strongest blows. Then this happens: So they slimed him with something that would prevent Cerberus from making him self destruct. That's all well in good, except 1. Then what actually stopped Metallo? He is standing and still poses a threat in that first panel, and he is down and making wisecracks in the second one. There is no mention of this goop actually being able to hurt him. 2. How did the SCU even know to be ready with this goop. No one mentions having previously suspected that Metallo was working with Cerberus until he said so himself. So the entire climax to this story makes absolutely no sense. Add to that earlier moments of lazy convenience, like when Metallo somehow knows exactly what Superman is thinking for no apparent reason: or the general absence of meaningful character interactions that are normally the hallmark of an Ordway story. And Grummett's turning in inferior work this time around too. Explain the physics of these two panels to me: Panel 1: Supes goes straight up. Panel 2: Supes goes diagnally through a building. Even panels like this one show far far too much dialogue being pressed into one moment: I don't generally discuss Grummett. I neither like nor dislike his art most of the time. It's totally adequate. And yet it falls apart repeatedly in this issue, just as Ordway's writing unexpectedly does, all while tacking a topic that seems like it should belong to a different creative team and title. Important Details:1. Cerberus is aided by a "dragon lady" and possibly a third character (visible in the first panel, although that might well be Cerberus): 2. Lucy Lane remains in a coma, but her condition is stable. 3. Jose Delgado is paralyzed all over again thanks to Metallo. This will be an interesting opportunity to get a better look at Lexcorp under Lex II since they are the only ones who can repair him. Or maybe someone at STAR Labs can dig up Dr. Stone's files on Cyborg. Minor Details:1. Metallo has been recaptured. 2. This seems too specific to not be someone working at DC. It could be a very very poor likeness of Roger Stern, perhaps? 3. We finally see the Metropolis Special Crimes Unit in action and not totally screwing up: ...or do we? After a while, backup arrives in the form of TWO guys with bazookas. Seriously, why does Metropolis even finance such a highly ineffective department? I'd love some backstory explaining that it was the result of the Mayor's efforts to get the National Guard off of their backs or that the team exists for legal purposes (insurance companies need to see the city making some effort to protect itself beyond depending on Superman or something), but the unit makes no sense as is. 4. Did we forget about Supes keeping his other clothes and glasses in a secret pouch in his cape? 5. Yeah, I feel a little bad about bringing this one up, but I also feel like we need to discuss the (unintended, I assume) racism happening in this book exactly when the Superman Office is trying so hard to introduce a positive Black character in the form of Ron Troupe. I guess it's easier to miss or overlook when a comic simply doesn't have any Black people in it. However, in attempting to right that mistake, the office is stumbling with race representation quite a bit. take, for example, this moment: A disrespectful, loud-mouthed Black teen who speaks in street slang. I mean, look, such people did and do exist, but in a book with so few Black people being represented, maybe this wasn't the way to go, especially when written and drawn by two White dudes. And add to that this little moment afterwards, in which Jose Delgado saves that same kid: Note that this is how the story opens. It ends with Jimmy Olsen saving Ron Troupe: Apparently, Black people need a lot of saving from people who aren't even Superman. Ron Troupe is particularly upsetting as the guy is as upstanding as they come, outright resembling a non-powered Clark Kent, and yet his getting a job at the Daily Planet is dependent upon his connection with a kid who takes his job far less seriously and recently quit, only to get his job back because the people there like him so much. I don't think we're supposed to feel the privilege in this moment of Jimmy selflessly offering to help Ron, but it irks me quite a bit. Troupe should be working his way up so hard (and seeing the payoff as a result) that he makes those coasting above him nervous. All in all, a totally forgettable issue outside of Jose Delgado's paralysis and the revelation about Ceberus. Too bad.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,867
|
Post by shaxper on Feb 28, 2024 19:51:56 GMT -5
Superman: The Man of Steel #13 (July 1992) "Brain Trust" Script: Louise Simonson Pencils: Jon Bogdanove (layouts); Dennis Janke (finishes) Inks: Dennis Janke Colors: Glenn Whitmore Letters: Bill Oakley Grade: D+ I tried. I really tried to lower my expectations for this culmination to a year-long build-up, and yet somehow this still managed to be dumber than I expected. This is a bad concept for a He-Man toy, not a solution to the question of what mastermind has been orchestrating this brilliant assault on Metropolis for all of these months. And then it gets dumber... Let's also be clear that this brilliant mastermind (or, these brilliant mastermindS) purposefully led Superman to their base or origin...and then didn't work out a plan for what to do once he got there. There is no story to this story, and not even any kind of motive nor origin attributed to these villains that we've now waited twelve months to meet. It is a stupid stupid throwdown that could have made for one cheesy and forgettable 20 page story. No way in hell did this warrant thirteen months of our attention. In the end, there was nothing clearly at stake and nothing clearly achieved by the climax. Simonson has managed to thrust upon us a D level character that she sure hopes we will demand the return of, and nothing more: Please tell me we never see these characters again. The one positive I can offer about this issue is that Bogdanove's art (with Janke's help) is getting significantly better. The pacing and arrangements are surprisingly strong: and even Bogdanove's terrible proportions are starting to look more like a stylistic choice and less like incompetence: It's a little surprising that Bogdanove and Simonson aren't doing this thing in the pages of ACTION Comics, considering that this issue was all action and no plot, as well as the fact that last week's issue of Action was all plot and no action. Important Details:1. Lucy Lane is awake and recovering. 2. 1st full appearance of Cerberus. 3. Superman's powers have been temporarily weakened (not that Simonson ever bothered to explain how) Minor Details:1. Are we ever going to find out how these guys had the tech to build a motion-activated missile that can reach inner orbit without any kind of guidance, as well as hold Superman against his will, how they can build a hide-out that also conveniently converts into a missile, or even how they are inhibiting Superman's powers? Seems like you could amass a whole ton of power through legitimate channels just by copyrighting all this tech instead of erecting an underground shadow organization. 2. A room full of hundreds of heads, all able to connect to Cerberus, and yet (conveniently enough) the only four actually doing anything are all resting on a shelf next to one another. 3. It's been repeatedly stated that the Post-Crisis Superman's heat vision is invisible, so how does this guy know that he's using it? 4. Okay, so Superman cannot move while attached to a missile because the g-forces are too powerful for him, he didn't get a chance to take a breath so he is about to black out, and he worries that igniting the fuel tank with his heat vision will kill him? This is Superman we're talking about, right? 5. Physics don't work like this. The chances of Superman's weight inadvertantly causing the missile to turn enough to head back exactly to its origin point are so ridiculously small here. 6. I'm a pretty liberal-leaning guy, and even I found this moment unnecessary and embarrassingly preachy: Just, like, show diversity in this book. It's not that hard. How's Ron Troupe feeling about his new position? Are we even going to show him in this issue? 7. Okay, I was thinking kidnapping a senator's daughter because he didn't vote on your bill was overkill, but what the f**k is this? What exactly do these people think goes on up on Capital Hill?? Rule #1 for writing a political drama: have some sense of how politics actually work. 8. So this plotline is still inching along at a snail's pace. There is a shady doctor and a blood disease. Weeks of hinting at that. Not intrigued yet. 9. So many problems with this utterly lazy attempt to create yet another complication in the life of Jimmy Olsen: But let's focus on...Lucy Lane is okay?? This is how they reveal that pertinent info--as a minor detail in an otherwise totally uninteresting subplot? Her nearly dying was the central fricking focus of Superman #68 just three weeks ago (and far less time than that in Superman's world!). Now she's suddenly totally fine other than being in a wheelchair?
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,867
|
Post by shaxper on Mar 9, 2024 14:00:31 GMT -5
Superman #69 (July 1992) "-- Killing Is Serious Business" Script: Dan Jurgens Pencils: Peter Krause Inks: Keith Williams Colors: Glenn Whitmore Letters: John Costanza Grade: F This may be the worst Post-Crisis Superman comic I've yet read; not the most upsetting, certainly not the most tacky nor offensive, but man does this one just fail on every possible level. I've noted for a while now that Jurgens has seemed rushed/overworked/not giving things is best effort anymore, and that is nowhere more evident than in this issue, which is another shameless effort to sell the fanboys on his creation, Agent Liberty (who does not operate in Metropolis and has no particular reason to keep running into Superman beyond self-promotion). One would expect Jurgens to put more effort into such an issue, especially since we've been building towards this storyline for a while now, but Jurgens ends up having to call in guest artist Peter Krause, whose awkward style absolutely undermines this story at all its key moments: and Jurgens' writing ends up being even worse. The goal of this issue appears to be twofold: sell us on Agent Liberty, and show us that Pete Ross is a worthwhile supporting character in this universe worth caring about. For Agent Liberty, I have to think Jurgens was beginning to notice how big antiheroes were getting. Deathstroke was dominating sales at DC at the time, so his boy, Agent Liberty (who didn't seem to have much of a personality before) is now a guy who can murder in cold blood and yet somehow also has a heart of gold. Okay. Not a terrible new direction for the character, suddenly having to work against the very agency that made him. I just don't have any particular interest in this character, who has absolutely nothing to do with the Superman franchise beyond the name "Dan Jurgens". As for Pete Ross and his moral dilemma of whether to kill another man in front of the entire nation or risk Lana Lang being killed... so much of the problem here (Krause's art aside) is that, not only do we not have a firm grasp on who Pete Ross is and why we should care about him, but Jurgens doesn't seem to know either. A dilemma like this should reveal something meaningful within the character -- it should expose their hidden strengths and weaknesses, their values and character, but Jurgens just has Pete keep flipflopping in the most non-sensical of ways, even after the hit has occurred and Pete now has to decide whether or not to tell someone what's going on. The answer SHOULD be clear. He's a dead man to these people at this point: and yet... "Superman, you've got to find Lana Lang...RIGHT NOW!" Say it, dammit. Say it. I mean, clearly these guys were never going to let her live any more than they were going to let Pete live. This is just...stupid. And then Superman lets a single unnamed police officer take Pete away, never once suspecting that it might be an attempt to kill him. Usually, I save what I'm about to do next for the Minor Details section of my reviews, but this issue is just so completely full of idiotic moments, so let's nitpick, shall we? 1. Thanks for the excessive exposition for the reader's sake: Even going so far as to address him by title ("JUDGE Kramer") so that everyone understands who that character is. It's hilarious, really. 2. More of this crap, AND they've decided to put this critical assassination attempt in the hands of the loveable boy next door, who has already stood up to them once, and who (for all we know) may not even know how to fire a gun! Sure it'll work out fine! 3. Superman sure got dumber. My 81 year old mother could get a clean shot at this guy with Superman guarding him like that. 4. Yeah, Supes. Don't take the one second to inspect Pete Ross' suitcase with your X-Ray vision because you know him so well. Let's be clear that we're in the Post-Crisis. This Pete Ross was never Superboy's best friend. He and Clark grew up in the same town, and Superman respects him ever since the events of Superman #45, where Pete expressed true empathy for a wronged Native American tribe. That's the full extent of their relationship. They're not best friends, Pete played no role in the Man of Steel limited series that walked us through Clark's childhood and Smallville years, so Superman's trusting him so inherently doesn't make sense. And, even if it did, it takes one second to look at this suitcase with X-Ray vision. Superman trusts Lana, and yet she was a sleeper agent for the Manhunters, right? 5. So much wrong here. Has Jurgens ever watched a televised session of congress? "Excuse me, I have to make an announcement" is not how you get the floor's attention. On top of that, after this moment, everyone watching decides that they saw Pete give the gun to Lockwood, but that clearly isn't what happened here. They were video recording these sessions in 1992. It wouldn't be hard to go back and see Pete clearly trying to stop him while exclaiming "Nooo!". 6. Back to Superman utterly sucking at his job. How is he the LAST to know what's going on? Seriously. Even if he was dumb enough not to be in the same room, carefully watching, he has super hearing. 7. ...and super speed. . Jurgens keeps conveniently forgetting this. Superman magically kept forgetting to use his powers last issue too. 8. More with the super speed. This conversation takes multiple pages and a lot of dialogue, implying a long flight from the Capitol Building to the nearest hospital. so that the dude can conveniently die RIGHT before naming his accomplices. I'm guessing Jurgens did zero research for this story though, because the nearest hospital to the Capitol Building, (then known as Riverdale Hospital, now known as Bridgepoint Health) is 4 minutes away by car during light traffic. You'd think there'd need to be a hospital nearby specifically for a situation like this. Flying without having to follow roads and slow down for traffic should have had the senator there in, what, sixty seconds? 9. How the hell did an unlicensed military aircraft owned by a secret group get this far into Capitol Hill airspace without detection?? 10. Wouldn't this mystery have been a little more captivating if we hadn't been given the answers right upfront? 11. More unnecessary explanations for the sake of the reader. Why the hell would you explain your entire plan to the woman you are holding against her will? And, seriously, can we stop writing stories in which Lana's life gets turned inside out, already? 12. Show me a Federal Penetentiary where the prison cells look like they're from 12th Century Europe: 13. Okay, you're a judge who also co-runs a shadowy paramilitary agency, and you need to kill a guy who has valuable info on you. You can just hire an assassin: but why be that efficient when you are f**king JUDGE KRAMER? Let's throw some totally unnecessary and damn risky pagentry into the mix!: Because killing Ross quickly, quietly, and arousing as little suspicion as possible about his movements just before his death certainly aren't a priority here. 14. Deathstroke didn't shoot Lucy last issue. He doesn't even use a gun. Why does no one seem to understand this? 15. Last week, Louise Simonson forced a new conflict for Jimmy Olsen and Lucy Lane that seemed totally arbitrary and artificial. But, somehow, it isn't an issue now, and they're totally fine. See, Jimmy? Lucy is totally fine. No need to further extend this conflict that no one is asking for by suddenly actually having feelings for the other girl, right? Right? 16. I'm so utterly confused by this scene. Beyond the question of what the hell is happening with Lex's characterization here, I'd like to think I'm pretty knowledgeable about this franchise and its characters by this point, and yet, when I consider this large cast of characters and ask myself who is strong, civic-minded, and a great choice to head a committee devoted to improving Metropolis, Collin Thornton wasn't even on my list. Heck, it took me half a second to even remember who that was. Funny how it was so obvious to everyone else in this scene, though! And, really, why do we care about this committee and who is placed on it, anyway? Should we discuss who will head the city Refuse Department next? In the end, this was just a very very bad issue. The plot is entirely forgettable, and the execution is even worse. No one needs this comic. Imporant Details:1. Pete Ross is suspected of attempting to murder an informant in the middle of a congressional investigation.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,867
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 2, 2024 10:14:57 GMT -5
Superman: The Man of Steel #14 (August 1992) "Night Moves" Script: Louise Simonson Pencils: Jon Bogdanove Inks: Dennis Janke Colors: Glenn Whitmore Letters: Bill Oakley Grade: D Recently, the Superman titles have been where less lucrative characters (coughcoughAgentLibertycoughDeathstrokecoughcoughAquaman) have come to ride some coattails, but now the tables have turned, with Superman getting an unexpected and wholy unwarranted visit from Robin: DC's #1 seller in 1992. I've argued previously that I think crisis mode set in at the Superman Office when Panic in the Sky failed to move the needle on sales four months back (and that this will ultimately result in the Death of Superman), so here's an almost embarrasingly desperate stopgap move by DC to keep four of their better selling titles from going down the drain as DC continues to lose ground to Marvel, image, and even Valiant Comics. The opening doesn't do much to dissuade us of the sense that this is desperate and driven more by sales than the need to tell a worthwhile story; a four-panel explanation that explains precious little at all before Robin presumably swings a silk cable from Gotham to Metropolis with absolutely no mention of why Batman isn't involved in this case at all: Who needs a backstory? We're here to see Superman and Robin hunt vampires, apparently. Not that it ever happens in this issue. The cover is a blatant lie, as the only team-up that occurs within is between Robin and Jimmy Olsen, which is probably more fitting anyway: Interestingly enough, this is not the first time that the Post-Crisis Superman Office has looked to Batman for a sales bump while also hunting a vampire, though the events of Action Comics Annual #1 are never mentioned in this issue. Surprising, as there are so many other really strong and deliberate continuity references made within. For one thing, we get our first reference to "Golden Throne," which is (presumably) a novel written by Clark that has just gone to paperback. A previous novel of his, entitled "The Janus Contract", was already being marked down for discount by the time of Superman #49 twenty months ago in our time, and roughly five months ago in Superman's time (assuming one week in his world still roughly equals one month in ours). Odd to have never seen this new novel mentioned before, though. Also in terms of continuity, we have the return of Clark's neighbor, Andrea, who was seemingly originally set up to be a love interest way back in Adventures of Superman #457 (August 1989) and hasn't even been mentioned since Action Comics #656 (August 1990). Well, she's living with someone now, and it's not going well: On the one hand, I find it hard to believe that Clark's super hearing never picked up any of this going on in his neighbor's apartment down the hall before. On the other, it stands to reason that most of the time that he's actually home in his apartment, he's probably with Lois and doing his best to tune out that super hearing. However, the single biggest contribution this issue makes to continuity comes from this extremely minor detail: Six months earlier, Denny O'Neil (Editor at the Batman Office) established that Gotham City is neighbored by Boston, New York, Metropolis, and the Atlantic Ocean. Right between Boston and New York, and on the Atlantic Ocean is Hartford, Connecticut, presumably the in-universe location of Gotham City: This reference implied that Metropolis existed in place of Albany NY in the DCU. Albany is even adjacent to the Hudson River, and Metropolis' proximity to a major river is a key detail in several Post-Crisis Superman stories: but none of this had been confirmed by the Superman Office. However, this highway connecting Baltimore and Metropolis, located 150 miles North of Washington, seems to corroborate the idea that Metropolis is Albany. So, unless we are given evidence to the contrary, Albany NY seems to be the geographic location of the Post-Crisis Metropolis. As for the story itself, there isn't all that much here. We've got a vampire that enjoys making nods to classic vampire films, including: Dracula (1931, Bela Lugosi): Nosferatu (1922, Max Schreck): and even London After Midnight (1927, Lon Chaney): suggesting that either Bogdanove or Simonson is a real classic cinemaphile, which was already heavily implied when they did the Atomic Skull story together back in November. A little disappointing that they go through all those looks only to pretty much come back to the Max Schreck/Nosferatu visual when finally revealing Ruthven's actual appearance: ...and don't get me started on the absurd technobabble in that panel. Anyway, even though Robin wasn't knowledgeable enough to be aware of this, your resident Language Arts teacher here knows that Ruthven was the name of literature's very first vampire, written by John William Polidori in 1819, seventy-eight years prior to Bram Stoker publishing Dracula. Simonson and Bogdanove know their vampires. Too bad they don't seem to know how to tell a good story with one. Okay, yes, the climax is kind of cool: but, much like that obnoxious kid on the elementary school playground who ruins every game of make-believe, Ruthven's response to everything done to him in this issue is "Nuh-uh-uhh! I've got...ummm...scientific stuff that makes me immune to that!". Heck, they don't even bother to explain why the sun doesn't hurt Ruthven. It just...doesn't. And then there's a "to be continued". Crappy crappy storytelling. On the art side, Bogdanove continues to improve, and his classic vampires are spot-on, but his need to exaggerate proportions still walks an uneasy balance between stylistic and just plain amateur. Here's an example of the latter: Minor Details:1. For months, we've been building up clues about this mysterious doctor and an enigmatic disease going around, and the best we ended up getting was a vampire sucking blood? Geez. 2. Lucy's finally home from the hospital...only to be a victim of the vampire. First she's blind. Then she's miraculously cured by bits of Bizarro Superman falling into her eyes (??), then she gets shot f*cking point blank by a giant laser cannon intended to take down Deathstroke, then she's magically all better after a few issues with no real explanation, and now she's a bride to a vampire. It's like Lucy only exists in these comics to get seriously injured and/or to get screwed over by Jimmy Olsen (and dating Jimmy Olsen might be worse than all those other tragedies combined). 3. Nice reference to Bernie Wrightson but why? Usually, these kinds of nods are made to previous Superman writers and artists. Yes, this is a horror adjacent storyline, so an artist known primarily for horror is a little more appropriate, but is Wrightson famously known for doing any vampire stories? I most closely associate him with Swamp Thing and Frankenstein. 4. So...let's be clear. Jimmy Olsen waited until the next day to tell Lois and her family that Lucy got bitten by a vampire and is under its control? (nice nod to Ghostbusters with Tobin's Spirit Guide, by the way)Like he even saw Lucy's parents and then just didn't tell them? It's not like they weren't going to believe him either, as they fully take his word on it without a second's hesitation almost immediately after this panel. Post-Crisis Jimmy really is a d*ck. 5. How is Robin neither stunned nor even bleeding after this? Did Batman train him how to take a bottle to the face? 6. This seems a little over-the-line for Superman: "You gave me cancer just to prove a damned point!" "Well you SAID it wasn't cancerous. Muwahaha!"
|
|
|
Post by chadwilliam on Apr 3, 2024 21:45:37 GMT -5
Robin and Jimmy Olsen teamed up enough times during the Silver Age that the boy wonder's inclusion here may have been intended to see if such a pairing had legs in the present day. Kind of glad the idea didn't take off since Robin is, as you noted, written so out of character here.
"Extreme problems require extreme solutions!" sounds like the sort of thing Tim Drake was trying to talk Batman out of believing during A Lonely Place of Dying rather than a sentiment the future Robin was taking to heart. ("That's totally rad, Batman!")
Perhaps because it was thought of as a Jimmy Olsen-Robin story, no one at the Superman offices really appreciated the opportunity this story offered them to examine Superman's reaction to meeting the third Robin. When Byrne had Superman meet Dick Grayson's Robin during his run (can't recall the issue number) didn't the man of steel remark something like, "When I first heard that Batman had taken on a junior partner, I didn't approve" before deciding that since Batman seemed a lot happier, he couldn't really object? In light of Jason Todd's fate - in a story in which Superman appeared - one would think that Superman's perspective would be worth investigating when his path inevitably crossed with that of Robin Number Three's. Had the Superman team thought of things in this light, perhaps greater care would have been taken in handling Tim Drake's portrayal.
Superman: You're taking on another Robin? After what happened to the last child to wear that costume? Batman: Jason was a good soldier but reckless to the point of being self-destructive. Tim is level-headed and considers all possible-
Cue Tim Drake leaping out of the Batmobile as he drives it off the tail of Batman's giant dinosaur trophy and explodes.
Robin: Totally rad!!!
As it is, Superman should be coming out of this introduction with Robin less than impressed with Bruce Wayne's child-rearing skills - I mean, was Robin really about to murder Lucy Lane?
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,867
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 3, 2024 22:34:47 GMT -5
Perhaps because it was thought of as a Jimmy Olsen-Robin story, no one at the Superman offices really appreciated the opportunity this story offered them to examine Superman's reaction to meeting the third Robin. When Byrne had Superman meet Dick Grayson's Robin during his run (can't recall the issue number) didn't the man of steel remark something like, "When I first heard that Batman had taken on a junior partner, I didn't approve" before deciding that since Batman seemed a lot happier, he couldn't really object? In light of Jason Todd's fate - in a story in which Superman appeared - one would think that Superman's perspective would be worth investigating when his path inevitably crossed with that of Robin Number Three's. Had the Superman team thought of things in this light, perhaps greater care would have been taken in handling Tim Drake's portrayal. While that would be the logical reaction for Superman, this office did work especially hard with the Dark Knight Over Metropolis storyline to remove any remaining tensions between Batman and Superman, presumably so that Batman fans would quit scoffing at Superman fans and accusing him of being too much of a "boyscout". Batman liking Superman theoretically allowed Batman readers to feel less self-conscious and hokey in buying Superman titles, so new tensions between the two could theoretically undo that and hurt sales.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,867
|
Post by shaxper on Jun 21, 2024 13:57:04 GMT -5
Superman #71 (September 1992) "Evil's Pawn" Script: Dan Jurgens Pencils: Dan Jurgens (layouts); Brett Breeding (finishes) Inks: Brett Breeding Colors: Glenn Whitmore Letters: John Costanza Grade: D So much of the beauty of the 1990 Superman Office was the thrill of their discovering that, with three monthly titles, they could churn out major, multi-part events practically every month and, with a supportive editor looking to generate sales in their corner, they could shake things up within those storylines as much as they pleased. Now, two years later, we're feeling the inevitable backlash from this: four issues of content (six if you want to count the loosely related and equally worthless vampire storyline before this) that are forgettable, incomprehensible, and largely inconsequential. Every comic book line has its filler issues that aren't up to snuff, but when this office falters, its a major multi-issue disappointment. The story itself feels...arbitrary. They just seem to be making things up as they go. Here, Satannus is suddenly evil, and I'm not sure why nor when Superman decided this: He and Blaze are fighting for control of a dimension and all the souls in it, I guess, except Blaze also wants the Newstime Staff, except hadn't we established repeatedly in the previous issue that she was just using them to get Superman's soul (which doesn't seem to interest her at all here)? Once again, we're shown that Superman's powers don't work in this dimension... ...except that all of his powers other than flight apparently do? And don't get me started with why the hell this is the climax of the storyline: nor why it causes this to happen: nor why Blaze WANTS to go through the portal Satannus created to the ordinary world. Weren't they both trying to claim the dimension they're now trying to leave up to this point? This is some serious "winging-it" nonsense that might get a pass in a single, stand-alone story, but when you've taken eighty eight pages and $5 of an adolescent's spending money (A LOT in 1992!), you owe them a little more than this. The few positives from this story include being reassured that Jerry White is definitely and truly gone, beyond even the reach of Hellish demons: Jerry's "appearances" were just illusions concocted by Blaze.this damn impressive moment for Perry White: After all, we've just been reminded that this office unceremoniously killed of Jerry White two years back. While Supes, Lois, and Jimmy weren't going anywhere (just yet) who's to say that this wasn't going to be the true and final death of Perry White? For half a second, I was ready to believe it.and (of course) the coining of the term "Fosgoyle": I guess it's a big deal that Colin Thornton finally has a purpose in this franchise; but I call foul on the implication that he was Satannus all along. After all, why would the guy looking to either steal Superman's soul or at least keep it from Blaze (I'm still confused on this matter) fire Clark Kent way back in Adventures of Superman #464, and why would an otherworldly demon who can posses people and seemingly amass limitless material gain for himself in such a way be distraught that his empire is crumbling due to lack of capital only four months back in Adventures of Superman #490? from Adventurs of Superman #490Sure seems like such a being wouldn't need to sell out to Lex Luthor. So either we're later going to be shown that Satannus only recently took over Thornton's life, or the Superman Office is just making up even more stuff as they go. Important Details:1. Confimed by Satannus that Jerry White is really, truly dead and in some sort of Heaven where he cannot be touched. 2. Collin Thornton IS Satannus. 3. Sam Fosworth's soul now belongs to Satannus (though I missed how/when that happened too!) Minor Details:1. Gotta love how, in a chapel full of Newstime employees AND Lois Lane, Jimmy Olsen, and Perry and Alice White, they're the only ones shown in most panels, the only ones who ever seem to talk or do anything, and, at the end, absolutely none of those faceless people in the background died or were even seriously injured when the chapel they were in was collapsing because a giant demon was wailing on it. Lazy. 2. Supergirl goes for a classic Kirby pose and ends up somehow turning her hand into a disjoined mound of mush. Not sure whether that fleshy lack of linework is on Jurgens or on Breeding, but...eww.
|
|
|
Post by wildfire2099 on Jul 15, 2024 18:01:14 GMT -5
Hopefully it's not a bad sign that I have zero recollection of what any of the supporting cast were doing, other than perhaps a vague notion that Jimmy Olsen annoyed me
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,867
|
Post by shaxper on Jul 17, 2024 11:57:19 GMT -5
Action Comics #681 (September 1992) "Odds &...Endings" Script: Roger Stern Pencils: Butch Guice Inks: Denis Rodier Colors: Glenn Whitmore Letters: Bill Oakley Grade: A+ Well, it's taken long enough, but we finally have an issue that's reminding me what I love about this franchise. From a plotting perspective, it's just a further wrap up of the highly forgettable Blaze/Satannus War and a done-in-one story pitting two villains (well, one isn't a villain anymore, apparently) against each other, but it's the characterizations and small moments in between that make this one soar, like Perry composing the lead Daily Planet article along with the team as one big, functional work family: Though (once again) where's poor Ron Troupe?Supes and Maggie Sawyer just taking a moment to process some of the crazy they've experienced over the past few years: and Lois being a perfect support to Clark: as well as so many other human moments in this story that do nothing to further the plot and everything to make these characters feel real and lovable: ...and boy do Butch (Jackson) Guise's pencils help! Speaking of Guise (whose artwork has really become the star of this title), I was concerned at first that we were going to see a repeat of the same problem we've seen from him a lot lately: namely that he can draw gorgeous everyday poses, seemingly from photos or models, but that he couldn't depict comic book action and extreme expressions to save his life. We certainly begin to see that here: ...or, more specifically, here: Please note that's the same woman from two images earlier!but he pulls out of this rut and draws a few really dynamic moments after (with some significant help from Rodier): Seriously, with Stern writing this well, and Guise overcoming pretty much his only weakness as an artist, this book is comic gold! Now, for those that don't know or remember Rampage, she began as a forgettable Byrne villain waaaay back in Superman #7. Back then, Kitty Faulkner was a low level scientist working on a project that she felt was unethical. As punishment for trying to expose the lead scientist, he caused her to be transformed into, essentially, an orange Incredible Hulk. The true bad guy was stopped, Kitty was cured, end of story. But then, only two issues after Byrne departed from the office, seemingly without warning nor plan for the franchise without him, Roger Stern revisited Kitty and made her into a complex and sympathetic character, dying as a result of her experience, and fearful of seeking a cure that could cause her to become Rampage again. Perhaps most notably, by the end of the story (in which the evil scientist returns to manipulate her once again), there was some evidence that Rampage, once calmed from the shock (and perhaps outrage) of her transformation, had some level of self-control and intelligence: Superman describes her as "quite lucid," though whether he means Kitty is fully aware or merely functioning at Hostes fruit Pie ad Hulk levels was never really explored because Kitty goes on to make further appearances after that, always as a recovered scientist putting her life back together, and never again as Rampage now that no one was controlling her externally. In Adventures of Superman #450, she is working for STAR Labs alongside Prof. Hamilton, and she then goes on to play a key supporting role in the Will Payton Starman title (note: also written by Roger Stern) in Phoenix, Arizona, still as Dr. Kitty Faulkner. And now, in the wake of the Will Payton Starman title being cancelled five months earlier, Roger Stern has Dr. Faulkner return to Metropolis, now as the lead director of the new STAR Labs overseeing its reconstruction in the wake of Armageddon 2001. It's a really uplifting move, seeing this character rise back up from a character who was used, abused, and left for dead as much by John Byrne as by her previous employer, to someone who has built back her life better than ever through tireless resilience. And the growing friendship between Kitty and Lois in these pages is so positively endearing, as well. About time Lois had a life outside of Clark (though I suppose Clark could use a few friends who aren't Jimmy Olsen nor a half-mad scientist, himself). Anyway, while experiencing all of this for the first time, with the cover of the issue firmly in mind, I couldn't help but grimace. Goddamn, they were going to pull another Lana Lang and tear this woman back down by having her turn into Rampage again...but no. She does it herself. In the midst of an emergency, she makes the conscious choice to become Rampage again and, best yet, she is fully in control of herself as Rampage this time, more Jennifer Walters than Bruce Banner. In fact, she and Superman playing baseball with Hellgrammite's body might be the most fun this franchise has been in over a year! Really, the awful name and costume aside, I'd be all set to buy a Rampage solo series by this point, except that Stern keeps the character real: this is who Kitty needs to be in an emergency, but it isn't who she really wants to be: and I respect that choice, though I can't help but think they're missing out on a profitable new character, here. I wonder if they pitched it to Carlin for the up aboves and were told no? Either way, I'm VERY glad Kitty will be playing a role in the supporting cast going forward and have no doubt we will see Rampage again. Sure the resemblance to Marvel's She-Hulk is clear, but the characterization and tone are very different; I truly like Kitty Faulkner better. As for Hellgrammite, he's finally turning into a character too. His previous appearances have been forgettable at best, his characterization completely vague. So, while I still have no idea what his actual powers are beyond his ability to regenerate extremely slowly, Stern makes the unusual choice to play Hellgrammite both as a terrifying, methodical psychopath: and as the butt of the joke, totally ineffective once again: though I'm still left wondering what a guy like this is going to do with the millions of dollars in payment he is demanding from Markahm. Assuming he even has the ability to launder that kind of money successfully, how is he going to spend it? Weird dude with a giant tail just setting up residence in Beverly Hills? Even if he wants to build a high tech lab with the money, does he have the connections to make those purchases? I'd love to see him get the payment in cash, understand that it cost Markham everything, and then just burn it all because he's that crazy, but I doubt the Superman Office is giving his motive that much consideration. Important Details:1. Kitty Faulkner is the new Director of the newly rebuilt STAR Labs and now has total control as her alter ego, Rampage. 2. Hellgrammite has slow regenerative powers (it took days for him to regenerate the end of his tail from his previous encounter with Superman), and his backstory has not changed from the Pre-Crisis Brave and The Bold #80. Minor Details:1. Remember how it was implied two issues back that (miraculuously) absolutely no one was injured during the Blaze/Satannus War? from Superman #71Well someone apparenly forgot to tell that to Stern: Enjoy that guilt-free malt, Jimmy.2. I'm wondering if this is the first time we've heard Art Bailey's traffic report, as well as mention of radio station Q-96. Sure seems like the kind of thing this office would keep bringing back. 3. It's kind of a big deal that Stern has just decided the events of Brave and The Bold #80 (from 1968!) went down pretty much exactly the same way in the Post-Crisis: I'm not going to go back and examine the issue closely, but it's safe to say that was a very different Pre-Crisis Batman. Sure, it was Bob Haney writing, so there probably weren't any connections made to any continuity occuring in the core Batman titles of the time, but that's still a pretty reckless move to declare an entire 1968 DC comic book still "happened" in the Post-Crisis, especially when it would have been so damn easy to just recreate the Hellgrammite's backstory for the Post-Crisis in half a page. 4. For ages and ages, this office teased that there was something suspicious about the new director of STAR Labs, and now I guess that idea is totally abandoned. No mention whatsoever of a previous director in all of Kitty's explanations about the new job, here: Incidentally, that's Hellgrammite in the air vent, not the shadowy old director.5. Poor Jimmy Olsen (who I otherwise cannot stand) has been torturing himself over what happened to Clark Kent since the beginning of the Blaze/Satannus War, and you've got to love how Lois and Superman keep gaslighting him over making such a big deal about Clark likely being lost in a weird dimension full of Satannic demons: I seriously don't understand why they can't just tell him at this point. Superdickery in the Post-Crisis Era. 6. Please tell me this moment means Supergirl is going to take on a secret identity. I'm a huge Supergirl fan, and I really like how Matrix is developing into that hero in this title, even with her blind spot for Lex Luthor II. 7. And, speaking of Supergirl, do Stern and Guice have some sort of exclusive control over her at this point? I feel like we only see her in this title ever since the culmination of Panic in The Sky. 8. Sam Foswell doesn't remember that he was a demon nor that Satannus (disguised as Colin Thornton) is really controlling him, and no one other than Superman knows that Foswell was a demon in the first place. 9. I still don't buy that Thornton was always Satannus and hope we'll see an explanation for this down the road.
|
|
|
Post by sunofdarkchild on Jul 17, 2024 14:07:21 GMT -5
It's funny seeing that photographs of Batman are common at this point when Zero Hour would soon introduce the retcon that Batman is considered an urban myth by 99% of people and no one has ever photographed him, and at one point he has to ask Superman to stop Jimmy Olsen from revealing that he's real. I never understood why they decided to do that when Batman was on his 3rd Robin already and had been in action for at least 10 years in-universe. It made almost the entire post-crisis Batman continuity non-canon because so many of the stories revolved around Batman being a well-known figure, like HOW the guy who was elected mayor of Gotham whose entire election campaign was based on how the police are so ineffective compared to Batman and how he only wanted Gordon to stay on as commissioner because he didn't want to potentially jeopardize the police's relationship with Batman by firing Batman's best friend. I once tried to ask Chuck Dixon about it, but all he said was "it was time" to retcon Batman into being an urban legend even when it made no sense in the context of all previous stories.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,867
|
Post by shaxper on Aug 27, 2024 20:44:07 GMT -5
I think that Bogdanove's Superman with his ballooned up physique made him the best artist to set-up the "I was going to save the world, right all wrongs" approach outlined in part one before Jurgens with his more down to Earth rendering came in with the second half to deflate that guy. Plus, seeing as how Bogdanove has been injecting little Wayne Boring/Al Plastino flourishes into his work since day one, it would have been odd to have passed the squinty-eyed Superman flashback to Action Comics #1 assignment on to someone else. Interesting points. I'm not sure any of this was consciously considered by Boggy nor Carlin at the time, but it does help me to appreciate Boggy's work on this story a bit more. Thanks for that insight! More than anything, I think it illustrates that this Superman is guided by a far more mature vision than the original empowerment fantasy. If you truly want to be the embodiment of good in the world, you don't get there with punches and clever one-liners. I sure hope we will see some follow-up, but with this ever-expanding cast, we've already practically lost sight of Cat Grant and Jose Delgado, we haven't seen Alice the intern in quite a while, and did Morgan Edge ever get his trial?? And, of course, we want to see more of Kitty Faulkner, keep abreast of Emil and Mildred, see how Bibbo, Highpockets and Lamar are doing, get caught up on the Jimmy Olsen/Lucy Lane thing, get to the wedding of Pete Ross and Lana Lang, find out what Rose/Thorn is up to, keep track of the various interpersonal dramas playing out at Lex Corp, and how's Maggie Sawyer's daughter these days? That's a whole lot to keep track of, and even 22 pages a week isn't enough space to do it with.
|
|