|
Post by Warmonger on Mar 22, 2019 19:08:16 GMT -5
No collusion
Anderson Cooper looks like he’s about to cry.
So, Comey testimony...nothing-burger.
Mueller report...nothing-burger.
What’s next? Anymore conspiracy theories about the big, bad orange man?
What a great allocation of the tax payers dollars...
|
|
|
Post by beccabear67 on Mar 22, 2019 22:20:50 GMT -5
It's laughable that people could try and spin the letter from the AG about receiving the report as some sort of no collusion proof, not even Trump seems to be doing that at the moment. Collusion is already shown and public knowledge from a number of instances, during the election and afterward, along with all the instances it was lied about. Among the many indictments were Russians as well as Trump campaign people, some for the lies. This is not the end of all investigations, other charges could be/most likely are pending in many other areas that have also been turned up as serious and possibly criminal.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2019 23:15:42 GMT -5
^ Collusion is basically known by anyone who really has been paying attention.
as is the blatant, and done in FULL public view, the Obstruction of Justice.
anyone claiming the report (which has not been released to anyone for review yet, other than Barr) shows "no collusion, no obstruction" is just Trump apologists spinning tales to defend the toddler in chief who absolutely is unfit for office, and should have been removed by this point, but the hypocritical GOP Senators and House members serve themselves rather than the people of this Country.
sad.
on the plus side? Block is wonderful, it always makes me happy to see "this post is hidden".
|
|
|
Post by Prince Hal on Mar 23, 2019 12:55:02 GMT -5
The Captain, I know how you feel. Many's the time I'm surrounded (figuratively and literally) by those of a different political persuasion, so no worries. I know I'm left of center -- Obama disappointed me for being too conservative/ moderate at times -- but I also know that compromise is not a dirty word, especially in politics. And it certainly shouldn't be seen as capitulation. What strikes me so "funny" about conservatives these days is that they want their way or the highway. Think McConnell proclaiming that the GOP would do everything it could to insure that Obama would be a a one-term president, think Merrick Garland, think the scorched-earth tactics they used against Obamacare, which, as we all know, was the brainchild of the Heritage Foundation and was implemented here in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts by none other than Willard Mitt Romney, fer cripes' sakes! My point about you and the college issue is that you're borrowing trouble and putting the entire circus train before the horses.. We're way far out from crafting any proposals, let alone policies, on that issue., so it's too early for the "Yeah, but" arguments. I know how it is in Europe, and maybe the winnowing of potential college students does become a factor here. Too early to tell, though, and I tend to agree with you that b/c it smacks of too much government interference, it wouldn't fly here. Bringing it up isn't a problem, though. I think it's great to trouble-shoot ideas like this as a way to work out the bugs, but I also think that we shouldn't shoot down ideas based on the bugs we find in the proposal. We should anticipate them and then see if they can be worked out so that the proposal works for as many of us as possible. I saw this as similar to the way gun owners always take it up to Def-con 6 when the least little idea of reform is mentioned. As for the split between rural and urban America, it's obvious that the balance of population has shifted; voting power hasn't, though. Without the Electoral College (relic of the days of slavery that it is), we don't have Presidents Trump or Dubya Bush (at least his first term). Who knows how differently things might be today? (We need a "What If?" comic on that.) Your observation about the causes for the imbalance is spot-on. "Companies" have abandoned what previously have been the manufacturing, energy and agricultural centers of the nation. They've gone overseas, retooled their plants to make them more efficient, outsourced work and so on. Amoral, capitalistic entities can't be expected to behave in any other way, especially in an environment that's been sculpted to suit their needs alone. However, the very socialism many of the residents of these areas have been programmed to bark at when the word is mentioned is actually less socialistic than the system they lived and worked under in towns that for decades were reliant on one Poppa Corporation that was the area's largest employer, largest contributor to local taxes, largest philanthropic donor to the community, etc., etc. The communities become dependent on the corporations, the kids know they'll always have a job in the mine or the plant and life goes on nicely. Who needs to go to college? Who needs national health care? Poppa Corp takes care of everything. Until it doesn't. When they pull up stakes, there;s the weeping and gnashing of teeth, and pleas for sympathy, but... Ever try pleading with a rattlesnake? A shark? Same results when the profit margin is the sacred text and the shareholders are your gods. So now they need Social Security and Medicaid and FEMA. It's as if, because they've had a guaranteed style of life since dirt was new, they don't have the wherewithall to do what they want everyone else to do: pull themselves up by the proverbial bootstraps. It's not like anyone put any money into their local schools all those years. And so the military beckons and the proportion of casualties in those states far outweighs those of more prosperous states, and the opioids flow like water and meth is a quick way to make a buck. Where's all that American ingenuity? Where's the re-invention? Bemoaning the obvious gets us -- and them -- nowhere. What are we going to do to reinvigorate these places? Bringing back coal and strip-mining ain't gonna happen, no matter how much Trump bellows and no matter how much they want to believe him.
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Mar 23, 2019 13:54:00 GMT -5
At the risk of sticking my hand into a wasp nest I will just say this: When I see Americans, no matter where they fall on the political spectrum, refer to how things are in “Europe” when it comes to stuff like schools I cringe a bit. There are major differences between countries so talking about how things works in “Europe” often ends up ignoring so many factors its hard to ignore for me. I am a highschool teacher and guidens counsler and I work with this everyday so some of the last few pages just touches a nerve. I am not directing this against anyone specific btw so I hope I dont offend anyone with this. Oh and for those who doest know I am Danish. Well said. Comparing ourselves to Europe is an exercise in futility, especially when the country was founded explicitly as a rejection of many European values. That's an incredibly simplistic view of the causes of the Revolution, much less the founding of the colonies. And it's at least 200 plus years out of date. The idea that "European values" in the 17th and 18th Centuries somehow correspond with anything in the 21st century is at best naive. Though let me back-track a bit here...because there is something in this that is probably worth exploring and that I have long considered. That being, that Americans have had it ingrained in them that whatever is done in the U.S. is the best way for it to be done and whatever works somewhere...or even everywhere...else won't work here. Because...reasons. It's a sad detritus of the American Creation Myth that has unfortunately not yet been overcome.
|
|
|
Post by Pharozonk on Mar 23, 2019 14:02:04 GMT -5
Well said. Comparing ourselves to Europe is an exercise in futility, especially when the country was founded explicitly as a rejection of many European values. That's an incredibly simplistic view of the causes of the Revolution, much less the founding of the colonies. And it's at least 200 plus years out of date. The idea that "European values" in the 17th and 18th Centuries somehow correspond with anything in the 21st century is at best naive. It's not about whether those values are relevant today or not, but the fact that they still affect politics today anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Mar 23, 2019 14:06:15 GMT -5
That's an incredibly simplistic view of the causes of the Revolution, much less the founding of the colonies. And it's at least 200 plus years out of date. The idea that "European values" in the 17th and 18th Centuries somehow correspond with anything in the 21st century is at best naive. It's not about whether those values are relevant today or not, but the fact that they still affect politics today anyway. See my edit above.
|
|
|
Post by Prince Hal on Mar 23, 2019 14:06:44 GMT -5
At the risk of sticking my hand into a wasp nest I will just say this: When I see Americans, no matter where they fall on the political spectrum, refer to how things are in “Europe” when it comes to stuff like schools I cringe a bit. There are major differences between countries so talking about how things works in “Europe” often ends up ignoring so many factors its hard to ignore for me. I am a highschool teacher and guidens counsler and I work with this everyday so some of the last few pages just touches a nerve. I am not directing this against anyone specific btw so I hope I dont offend anyone with this. Oh and for those who doest know I am Danish. Well said. Comparing ourselves to Europe is an exercise in futility, especially when the country was founded explicitly as a rejection of many European values. What th'? Which values are we talking about here?
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Mar 23, 2019 14:14:19 GMT -5
Well said. Comparing ourselves to Europe is an exercise in futility, especially when the country was founded explicitly as a rejection of many European values. What th'? Which values are we talking about here? I don't want to speak for Pharozonk, though I have an inkling that I may know what he means and that I may have unfairly impugned him, which is why I went back and edited. So I'll wait for him to answer. But this gets into an area that I've thought about a lot and that may well work to explain why the U.S. is, in many ways, so incredibly ass-backwards compared to the rest of the world.
|
|
|
Post by Pharozonk on Mar 23, 2019 19:31:29 GMT -5
Well said. Comparing ourselves to Europe is an exercise in futility, especially when the country was founded explicitly as a rejection of many European values. What th'? Which values are we talking about here? Collectivism vs. rugged individualism is probably the biggest one, and probably has a trickle down effect on many values that make us differ with our European cousins.
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Mar 23, 2019 20:32:13 GMT -5
What th'? Which values are we talking about here? Collectivism vs. rugged individualism is probably the biggest one, and probably has a trickle down effect on many values that make us differ with our European cousins. So American myths.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Mar 23, 2019 20:37:34 GMT -5
A lot of the political difference between the US and Europe is less about philosophical development and more about how they came out of WW2. Most of Europe suffered pretty badly and had been suffering going into the mess. Afterward, they rebuilt, with the knowledge that they had to work together to survive and they needed to care of everyone, to move forward. The US came out of it stronger than before and its people having, relatively, suffered very little (not talking about losing loved ones; I'm talking about being bombed, tortured, humiliated, starved, metaphorically and literally raped, etc....) The Great Depression helped nudge the US a bit towards similar ideas, which Roosevelt implemented; but, the end result of the war put a halt to that, as the country and its power brokers revelled in their new statu. I don't think we will see real movement forward until this country really suffers enough to demand change and gets tired of a few lording it over the many.
|
|
|
Post by Cei-U! on Mar 23, 2019 21:38:59 GMT -5
What th'? Which values are we talking about here? Collectivism vs. rugged individualism is probably the biggest one, and probably has a trickle down effect on many values that make us differ with our European cousins. The cult of rugged individualism has been a cancer on the American soul for generations and should be terminated with extreme prejudice.
Cei-U! There, I said it! (oops, wrong thread!
|
|
|
Post by Mister Spaceman on Mar 23, 2019 21:49:16 GMT -5
Collectivism vs. rugged individualism is probably the biggest one, and probably has a trickle down effect on many values that make us differ with our European cousins. The cult of rugged individualism has been a cancer on the American soul for generations and should be terminated with extreme prejudice.
Cei-U! There, I said it! (oops, wrong thread!
I could not agree more.
|
|
|
Post by Pharozonk on Mar 23, 2019 21:59:59 GMT -5
I think you guys are misunderstanding me. I'm not arguing that it's right or wrong, simply that it's a way of thinking that's distinctly American in comparison to most European countries, and plays a large part in how our political system has shaped itself over the years.
|
|