|
Post by Prince Hal on Feb 1, 2016 9:22:24 GMT -5
Feb 1965.... I have a lot of books in collected editions form this month, and I had a handful of books form this month that I had sold off when I sold off my Silver Age Marvel stuff before moving halfway across the country, but I do currently own 1 book from this month, but it's something I picked up in the last couple of years on the cheap... good ole Sarge and the Howlers... -M Is there any theatre in World War Two where they didn't fight? Maybe the Aleutians?
|
|
|
Post by Farrar on Feb 1, 2016 18:48:34 GMT -5
February, 1966...I do remember that I wanted one issue in particular because I had seen ads for it the month before: The thing was, I wasn’t a real fan of the Flash I think I may have read only one of his regular comics and knew him mostly from the JLA, but I know that I wanted this issue because of the layout and the Johnny Quick story. You had to love the annuals that showed the title character beckoning you to take a peek, as Superman 183 had just a few months before. I loved DC's 80 page Giants. Those (what I call) "postcard" covers made each story within seem like the most exciting story ever. And you're right, Prince Hal, the "direct address" device was quite compelling, esp. to a young audience . And even though at that time I wasn't buying DC (still reading Harveys, I think), I remember looking through my cousins' immense DC collection when we visited them at holidays and being riveted by those DC house ads. By the time I could buy my own comics, I felt I had a good basic idea of the DC characters through the house ads and Direct Currents.
|
|
|
Post by Farrar on Feb 1, 2016 19:10:00 GMT -5
I have plenty of stories published in Feb. 1966 in reprint form (Essentials, Showcases, etc.), but the only actual issues I currently own, all bought as back issues a few years ago, are: Adventure #343: as Prince Hal noted, the LSH story refers to past events and creates a feeling of continuity for that series. For example, Star Boy, who was just expelled from the team in the last issue, shows up here. Avengers #27: one of my all-time favorite covers. and finally, Fantasy Masterpieces #2. I find it interesting that on the cover Marvel refers to its own "Golden Age" as being, what, just a few years earlier--the comic contains reprints of stories are just 5 to 6 years old. It also seems curious to me that Marvel would use one of its distribution slots for a sci fi/horror reprint book, but perhaps Marvel saw it in part as a way of further promoting its artists Kirby, Ditko and Heck, all of whom are mentioned on the cover. At any rate, FM would change its focus with the next issue and feature Golden Age Captain America reprints for a couple of issues and then a mixture of old superhero and horror tales (and eventually becoming Marvel Super-Heroes with #13, a combo try-out/reprint book).
|
|
|
Post by JKCarrier on Feb 4, 2016 0:50:06 GMT -5
Bought as back-issues:
Atom #24 House of Mystery #158 Metal Men #19 Mighty Crusaders #4 - Hard to believe Jerry Siegel had anything to do with this. Man, is it stinky. Superboy #128 Superman #185 Tales of Suspense #77
|
|
|
Post by Action Ace on Feb 29, 2016 21:29:21 GMT -5
it's that time again... March 1966, I now own.... Action Comics #337 Adventure Comics #344 Justice League of America #44 Superboy #129 Superman #186 Superman's Girl Friend, Lois Lane #65 World's Finest #157 Own as reprints... Amazing Spider-Man #37 Aquaman #27 Avengers #28 Batman #180 Detective Comics #351 Fantastic Four #51 Flash #161 Metamorpho #6 Tales of Suspense #78 Tales to Astonish #80 (Hulk only) Teen Titans #3 Wonder Woman #162
|
|
|
Post by Arthur Gordon Scratch on Mar 1, 2016 6:11:12 GMT -5
Fantastic Four #51
|
|
zilch
Full Member
Posts: 244
|
Post by zilch on Mar 1, 2016 9:02:56 GMT -5
Be about another year or so before i can start posting on this thread...
|
|
|
Post by Prince Hal on Mar 1, 2016 10:32:59 GMT -5
Topping my list of books I purchased that month was one of the iconic covers of the Silver Age, thanks to the talents of Kane and Anderson. Spooky, creepy, so skillfully designed. (Is there a possibility that Infantino did the layout?) The go-go checks don't even seem to be there because of the title banner and the driving rain. Of course, once you opened the book, the lush moody cover was replaced by a Moldoff-Giella generic-o-rama. It really can't be accused of being a bait-and-switch; after all, plastic bagging comics was a long way off, so you could leaf through the comic if the newsdeaer wasn't too cranky. The thing was, that cover was so good that you had to buy the comic even though the interiors were just a giant letdown. Had a less staid art team done the story, we might have ahd a full-blown classic on our hands. I remember liking this cover, too, whihc was no surprise because I loved seeing these heroes in their torn and tattered costumes, a la Sgts. Rock and Fury. But the pitiful look on Batman's face got to me, too, as did the ever-frightening word "plague." Lois Lane comics were, in the eyes of the couple of friends I had who liked comics, pretty darn close to the romance comics we only usually saw at the barber shop, of all places. I endured their taunts because so many of the stories were so weird, especially the imaginary stories in which Lois inevitably married someone else and took revenge on Superman. The plots were melodramas straight out of Dickens and my grandmother's soap operas (her "stories," she called them), but as I look back, I realize that Jerry Siegel was giving kids the same kinds of wish-fulfillment fantasies he was dishing out in his Legion stories. Except in Lois's series, it was all about fulfilling revenge fantasies, like the ones kids concocted against the likes of bullies, snobs, teachers, and parents who just never recognized how wonderful we were. Yes, these stories are primitive, but that's why they were also so emotionally powerful for kids. I remember the day I bought World's Finest 157 quite vividly. I had been playing some sport down at our school playground on a rare Saturday that my father didn't have me working around the house and picked this up afterwards. As I so often did, I read it on the way home, about a 15-minute walk or so. My house was at the top of a hill and if you stood on the sidewalk, you could easily see 10 or 12 houses down the street. As I turned onto that part of the street, I could see both of my parents outside looking my way, which was pretty weird. I still don't know why they were out there just as I emerged above the horizon. They could easily see that I had something in my hand. I quickly rolled up that somethign and inserted it down the sleeve of my jacket. Oh, did I mention that my parents had forbidden me from reading and/or buying comics? Yeah, it was one of those times. Who knows what inspired it that time... the usual paranoia and control issues, I guess. Anyway, they could easily see me doing somethong as I kept walking, especially when I raised my arm stiffly to wave to them. I can't recall how everything went down after that, but I do know I had to surrender the comic. My feeble attempt at smuggling it past the border guards was doomed from the moment they watched me fumbling with my jacket. I got much better at smuggling after that. As for the comic, it was a kind of forerunner to the Super-Sons stories from Earth Bob Haney). Ironic that it was about disobedient kids. No wonder my parents thought that comics reading accounted for my eventual moral bankruptcy.
|
|
|
Post by Prince Hal on Mar 1, 2016 14:17:44 GMT -5
I’m going to add a couple of other paper artifacts from March, 1966 that were among my purchases and that may add a certain je ne sais quoi to the proceedings. First up is the April issue of SPORT with its usual treasure trove of inside stories in a day when your diet of up-to-date sports info was limited to what you could read in the daily paper and the various monthlies, of which SPORT was by a long shot the best. SPORT was a sports and cultural education in a 120 pages of hardscrabble pulpy enjoyment, with the emphasis on baseball, football, boxing and basketball. It still reads well, with stories that go on forever in glorious black and white and a constant drumbeat for the challenges faced by black athletes. Nearly every month some pissed-off "cancel my subscription" @$$hole would write in to complain about all the attention SPORT paid to guys like Mays, Clemente, Jim Brown and Bill Russell. Which you can totally understand, given how lousy those guys were. And then there was the magazine that thought of itself as the NewYorker of sports magazines, Sports Illustrated, in which the balance was well maintained between the sports and the illustrated, as opposed to today's videogame on paper I am forced to read at the doctor's office. The issue on the left, for all its sophisticated cover implies, included a great story, "My Father, the Thing," about the son of a pro wrestler. The other has an interesting Frank Deford story about the historic Texas Western-Kentucky championship gane that makes nary a mention of Kentucky's all-white squad and its notable racist coach Adolph (You can't make this stuff up) Rupp getting manhandled by texas Western's all-black starters. One other great reading memory from that month was this little gem:
|
|
|
Post by berkley on Mar 1, 2016 17:39:42 GMT -5
Topping my list of books I purchased that month was one of the iconic covers of the Silver Age, thanks to the talents of Kane and Anderson. Spooky, creepy, so skillfully designed. (Is there a possibility that Infantino did the layout?) The go-go checks don't even seem to be there because of the title banner and the driving rain. Of course, once you opened the book, the lush moody cover was replaced by a Moldoff-Giella generic-o-rama. It really can't be accused of being a bait-and-switch; after all, plastic bagging comics was a long way off, so you could leaf through the comic if the newsdeaer wasn't too cranky. The thing was, that cover was so good that you had to buy the comic even though the interiors were just a giant letdown. Had a less staid art team done the story, we might have ahd a full-blown classic on our hands. I've never seen the interior story but I love this cover too: Lord Death Man's skeleton outfit is oddly effective, even though it's really just a kind of Hallowe'en costume that anybody might buy in a shop; that combined with the cemetery setting, and especially the way he's pictured, casually kicking Robin into an open grave while forcing Batman down to one knee, create an impression of serious menace that I don't get from most Batman adversaries. Even the mundane hand-gun adds to the effect: you get the feeling that he actually means to use it, that this isn't one of those villains like the Joker who's more interested in playing mind games, or simple crime-bosses like the Penguin, who just wants to get on with his business. Frank Miller should have used him in one of his hard-boiled Batman stories.
|
|
|
Post by berkley on Mar 1, 2016 17:48:17 GMT -5
I’m going to add a couple of other paper artifacts from March, 1966 that were among my purchases and that may add a certain je ne sais quoi to the proceedings. ... And then there was the magazine that thought of itself as the NewYorker of sports magazines, Sports Illustrated, in which the balance was well maintained between the sports and the illustrated, as opposed to today's videogame on paper I am forced to read at the doctor's office. The issue on the left, for all its sophisticated cover implies, included a great story, "My Father, the Thing," about the son of a pro wrestler. Love the artwork on that Gary Player SI cover. Anyone know the name of the artist? I haven't found it yet but looking for it I just discovered that Sports Illustrated have an online archive of back issues going back to the 50s: SI Vault
|
|
|
Post by Red Oak Kid on Mar 1, 2016 19:15:09 GMT -5
February, 1966...I do remember that I wanted one issue in particular because I had seen ads for it the month before: The thing was, I wasn’t a real fan of the Flash I think I may have read only one of his regular comics and knew him mostly from the JLA, but I know that I wanted this issue because of the layout and the Johnny Quick story. You had to love the annuals that showed the title character beckoning you to take a peek, as Superman 183 had just a few months before. I loved DC's 80 page Giants. Those (what I call) "postcard" covers made each story within seem like the most exciting story ever. And you're right, Prince Hal, the "direct address" device was quite compelling, esp. to a young audience . And even though at that time I wasn't buying DC (still reading Harveys, I think), I remember looking through my cousins' immense DC collection when we visited them at holidays and being riveted by those DC house ads. By the time I could buy my own comics, I felt I had a good basic idea of the DC characters through the house ads and Direct Currents. I think just about all the comics I bought in 1965 were Batman Annuals.
|
|
|
Post by Farrar on Mar 1, 2016 22:43:00 GMT -5
... And then there was the magazine that thought of itself as the NewYorker of sports magazines, Sports Illustrated, in which the balance was well maintained between the sports and the illustrated, as opposed to today's videogame on paper I am forced to read at the doctor's office. The issue on the left, for all its sophisticated cover implies, included a great story, "My Father, the Thing," about the son of a pro wrestler. Love the artwork on that Gary Player SI cover. Anyone know the name of the artist? I haven't found it yet but looking for it I just discovered that Sports Illustrated have an online archive of back issues going back to the 50s: SI VaultThat eye-catching cover is by Francis Golden.
|
|
|
Post by Farrar on Mar 7, 2016 10:33:52 GMT -5
The only comics I actually own from March 1966 are Adventure #344 (first part of the Super-Stalag of Space tale--great story!) and a rather tattered copy of Avengers #28. I don't currently own a copy of Fantastic Four #51 (also on sale in March 1966), but I can just picture kids at the newsstand back then being mesmerized by these two Kirby covers that both feature imposing central figures.
|
|
|
Post by Farrar on Mar 7, 2016 12:37:01 GMT -5
... Lois Lane comics were, in the eyes of the couple of friends I had who liked comics, pretty darn close to the romance comics we only usually saw at the barber shop, of all places. I endured their taunts because so many of the stories were so weird, especially the imaginary stories in which Lois inevitably married someone else and took revenge on Superman. The plots were melodramas straight out of Dickens and my grandmother's soap operas (her "stories," she called them), but as I look back, I realize that Jerry Siegel was giving kids the same kinds of wish-fulfillment fantasies he was dishing out in his Legion stories. Except in Lois's series, it was all about fulfilling revenge fantasies, like the ones kids concocted against the likes of bullies, snobs, teachers, and parents who just never recognized how wonderful we were. Yes, these stories are primitive, but that's why they were also so emotionally powerful for kids. That's a pretty great analysis of that particular series' appeal. Oh, did I mention that my parents had forbidden me from reading and/or buying comics? Yeah, it was one of those times. Who knows what inspired it that time... the usual paranoia and control issues, I guess. Anyway, they could easily see me doing somethong as I kept walking, especially when I raised my arm stiffly to wave to them. I can't recall how everything went down after that, but I do know I had to surrender the comic. My feeble attempt at smuggling it past the border guards was doomed from the moment they watched me fumbling with my jacket. I got much better at smuggling after that. My mother hated me reading comics too, she thought it was beneath me and would ruin my mind and eyes (?). I liked to draw and copied from comics and she hated me doing that (changed her tune somewhat when teachers and my friends' parents praised my drawing). Anyway, when I became old enough to buy my own comics, I too had to resort to subterfuge. I smuggled them into the house under my coat or in my schoolbag. I was buying not only new Marvels and DCs, but as we lived on the same block as a collectibles store that carried back issues, I was also buying a lot of older comics. I kept my comics stacked in a large cardboard box and my mother must've noticed the pile kept growing. At times she would take some of my comics from that box and throw them out, so I started putting my Archies or old Harveys on top, so that she would grab/toss those instead of my more cherished superhero comics.
|
|